Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 13:13:997390.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997390. eCollection 2022.

Terrorism and the internet: How dangerous is online radicalization?

Affiliations
Review

Terrorism and the internet: How dangerous is online radicalization?

Jens F Binder et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This work is concerned with the extent and magnitude of threat related to online radicalization in the context of terrorist acts and related offending. Online influences have been depicted as major drivers for the propagation and adoption of extremist ideologies, which often contain an element of collective grievance, and subsequent acts of violence. This is most pronounced in the discussion of so-called lone actor terrorism, but extends to all forms of extremist offending, and beyond. The present work situates online radicalization leading to terrorist acts within the wider context of grievance-based beliefs and attitudes. Further, it addresses current positions and debates surrounding the relevance and mechanisms of online radicalization in terrorist offending. Recent evidence from quantitative studies is reviewed to estimate prevalence of online radicalization and the level of threat that results from it. This is followed by a discussion of plausible, but opposing, interpretations of the estimates presented. While online radicalization does occur, with and without reference to offline processes, the resulting threat is not overly high. This assessment, however, refers to the present only and is unlikely to hold for the future, given the general growth and acceleration of online activity among terrorist actors.

Keywords: extremism; online radicalization; risk assessment; terrorism; terrorist offending.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bastug M. F., Douai A., Akca D. (2020). Exploring the “demand side” of online radicalization: evidence from the Canadian context. Stud. Conflict Terror. 43, 616–637. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2018.1494409 - DOI
    1. Brooks N., Shaw R. (2022). Fixated and grievance-fuelled persons: Considerations on the dangers of gaps, silos and disconnects. Psychiatry Psychol. Law, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1995518 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Capellan J. A. (2015). Lone wolf terrorist or deranged shooter? A study of ideological active shooter events in the United States, 1970–2014. Stud. Conflict Terror. 38, 395–413. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2015.1008341 - DOI
    1. Clemmow C., Gill P., Bouhana N., Silver J., Horgan J. (2022). Disaggregating lone-actor grievance-fuelled violence: comparing lone-actor terrorists and mass murderers. Terror. Polit. Viol. 34, 558–584. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2020.1718661 - DOI
    1. Clifford B., Powell H. (2019). Encrypted extremism: Inside the English-speaking Islamic state ecosystem on telegram. Washington DC: George Washington University.

LinkOut - more resources