Comorbidities and ethnic health disparities in the UK biobank
- PMID: 36313969
- PMCID: PMC9272510
- DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac057
Comorbidities and ethnic health disparities in the UK biobank
Abstract
Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between comorbidities and ethnic health disparities in a diverse, cosmopolitan population.
Materials and methods: We used the UK Biobank (UKB), a large progressive cohort study of the UK population. Study participants self-identified with 1 of 5 ethnic groups and participant comorbidities were characterized using the 31 disease categories captured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Ethnic disparities in comorbidities were quantified as the extent to which disease prevalence within categories varies across ethnic groups and the extent to which pairs of comorbidities co-occur within ethnic groups. Disease-risk factor comorbidity pairs were identified where one comorbidity is known to be a risk factor for a co-occurring comorbidity.
Results: The Asian ethnic group shows the greatest average number of comorbidities, followed by the Black and then White groups. The Chinese group shows the lowest average number of comorbidities. Comorbidity prevalence varies significantly among the ethnic groups for almost all disease categories, with diabetes and hypertension showing the largest differences across groups. Diabetes and hypertension both show ethnic-specific comorbidities that may contribute to the observed disease prevalence disparities.
Discussion: These results underscore the extent to which comorbidities vary among ethnic groups and reveal group-specific disease comorbidities that may underlie ethnic health disparities.
Conclusion: The study of comorbidity distributions across ethnic groups can be used to inform targeted group-specific interventions to reduce ethnic health disparities.
Keywords: Elixhauser Comorbidity Index; UK Biobank; comorbidity; ethnic health disparity; health equity.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association 2022.
Figures
References
-
- Daw J. Contribution of four comorbid conditions to racial/ethnic disparities in mortality risk. Am J Prev Med 2017; 52 (1S1): S95–102. - PubMed
-
- Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR.. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40 (5): 373–83. - PubMed
-
- Romano PS, Roost LL, Jollis JG.. Further evidence concerning the use of a clinical comorbidity index with ICD-9-CM administrative data. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46 (10): 1085–90. - PubMed
-
- Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG.. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46 (10): 1075–9; discussion 81–90. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources