Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep:13559:206-217.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-16760-7_20. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

Image Quality Classification for Automated Visual Evaluation of Cervical Precancer

Affiliations

Image Quality Classification for Automated Visual Evaluation of Cervical Precancer

Zhiyun Xue et al. Med Image Learn Ltd Noisy Data (2022). 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Image quality control is a critical element in the process of data collection and cleaning. Both manual and automated analyses alike are adversely impacted by bad quality data. There are several factors that can degrade image quality and, correspondingly, there are many approaches to mitigate their negative impact. In this paper, we address image quality control toward our goal of improving the performance of automated visual evaluation (AVE) for cervical precancer screening. Specifically, we report efforts made toward classifying images into four quality categories ("unusable", "unsatisfactory", "limited", and "evaluable") and improving the quality classification performance by automatically identifying mislabeled and overly ambiguous images. The proposed new deep learning ensemble framework is an integration of several networks that consists of three main components: cervix detection, mislabel identification, and quality classification. We evaluated our method using a large dataset that comprises 87,420 images obtained from 14,183 patients through several cervical cancer studies conducted by different providers using different imaging devices in different geographic regions worldwide. The proposed ensemble approach achieved higher performance than the baseline approaches.

Keywords: Automated Visual Evaluation; Ensemble Learning; Image Quality; Mislabel Identification; Uterine Cervix Image.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Examples of images in each quality category.
Fig.2.
Fig.2.
The classification confusion matrix of the test set
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Diagram of the proposed approach.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
T-SNE plots of training set

References

    1. Jeronimo J, Massad LS, Castle PE, Wacholder S, Schiffman M: Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images. Obstet. Gynecol, 110, 833–840 (2007) - PubMed
    1. Hu L, Bell D, Antani S, Xue Z, Yu K, Horning MP, et al.: An observational study of deep learning and automated evaluation of cervical images for cancer screening. Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI) 111(9), 923–932 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xue Z, Novetsky AP, Einstein MH, et al.: A demonstration of automated visual evaluation of cervical images taken with a smartphone camera. International Journal of Cancer, 10.1002/ijc.33029 (2020). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Desai KT, Befano B, Xue Z, Kelly H, Campos NG, Egemen D, Gage JC, Rodriguez AC, Sahasrabuddhe V, Levitz D, Pearlman P, Jeronimo J, Antani S, Schiffman M, de Sanjosé S: The development of “automated visual evaluation” for cervical cancer screening: The promise and challenges in adapting deep-learning for clinical testing: Interdisciplinary principles of automated visual evaluation in cervical screening. Int J Cancer. 2022. Mar 1;150(5):741–752. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33879. Epub 2021 Dec 6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guo P, Xue Z, Mtema Z, Yeates K, Ginsburg O, Demarco M, Long LR, Schiffman M, Antani S: Ensemble deep learning for cervix image selection toward improving reliability in automated cervical precancer screening. Diagnostics (Basel) 10(7), 451 (2020). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources