Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2023 Feb;49(2):223-225.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06914-8. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

ICU scoring systems

Affiliations
Editorial

ICU scoring systems

Amanda Quintairos et al. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intensive care units scoring systems and the added value to stakeholders. ICU Intensive Care Unit

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Power GS, Harrison DA. Why try to predict ICU outcomes? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(5):544–549. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA. A history of outcome prediction in the ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(5):550–556. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pellathy TP, Pinsky MR, Hravnak M. Intensive Care Unit scoring systems. Crit Care Nurse. 2021;41(4):54–64. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021613. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrison DA, Parry GJ, Carpenter JR, Short A, Rowan K. A new risk prediction model for critical care: the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) model. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(4):1091–1098. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259468.24532.44. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paul E, Bailey M, Kasza J, Pilcher D. The ANZROD model: better benchmarking of ICU outcomes and detection of outliers. Crit Care Resusc. 2016;18(1):25–36. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources