Higher rates of ultrasound synovial hypertrophy, bone erosion and power doppler signal in asymptomatic Brazilian elderly versus young adults: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 36315265
- DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05212-2
Higher rates of ultrasound synovial hypertrophy, bone erosion and power doppler signal in asymptomatic Brazilian elderly versus young adults: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
To evaluate the prevalence of musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) abnormalities in asymptomatic elderly individuals. A cross-sectional controlled study was conducted and MSUS of 23 joints (wrist, metacarpophalangeal-MCP, proximal interphalangeal-PIP, elbow, glenohumeral, hip, knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal-MTP joints) was performed in healthy individuals aged 18-29 (young, n = 32) and 60-80 years-old (elderly, n = 32). Quantitative synovial hypertrophy (SH) was measured in mm and a semiquantitative scoring system (0-3) was used to grade SH, power doppler (PD) and bone erosion (BE). Young and elderly participants were 26.2 ± 3.2 and 65.9 ± 4.4 years-old, respectively. As compared to the young participants, elderly individuals had higher SH values in 35% of the joint surfaces (P < 0.05), higher rates of scores 1-3 for SH at the dorsal surface of the 3rd MCP, palmar surface of the 2nd MCP, 2nd PIP, 3rd MCP and 3rd PIP and subtalar joints (17.2 vs. 1.6%, P = 0.002; 29.7 vs. 6.3%, P = 0.001; 12.5 vs. 1.6%, P = 0.016; 21.9 vs. 6.3%, P = 0.011; 21.9 vs. 7.8%, P = 0.025; and 24.2 vs. 6.3%, P = 0.005, respectively), BE at the radiocarpal, ulnocarpal, dorsal surface of the 2nd MCP and posterior area of the glenohumeral joints (10.9 vs. 1.6%, P = 0.028; 12.5 vs. 0%, P = 0.003; 9.4 vs. 0%, P = 0.012; and 29.7 vs. 10.9%, P = 0.008, respectively) and PD at the dorsal surface of the 2nd and 3rd MCP joints (9.4 vs. 0%; P = 0.012 and 7.8 vs. 0%; P = 0.023, respectively). BE scores ≥ 1 were more frequent in the elderly (P < 0.05) in 22 (88%) of the joint surfaces evaluated. MSUS abnormalities are more frequent in asymptomatic elderly individuals as compared to young subjects.
Keywords: Bone erosion; Elderly; Musculoskeletal ultrasound; Power doppler; Synovial hypertrophy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Articular Ultrasound in Asymptomatic Volunteers: Identification of the Worst Measures of Synovial Hypertrophy, Synovial Blood Flow and Joint Damage Among Small-, Medium- and Large-Sized Joints.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Jun;43(6):1141-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017. PMID: 28365205
-
Sonographic assessment of healthy peripheral joints: evaluation according to demographic parameters.J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Dec;33(12):2087-98. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.12.2087. J Ultrasound Med. 2014. PMID: 25425364
-
Is There a Difference Between the Joint Ultrasounds of Healthy Women and Men? A Study With Small, Medium, and Large Joints.Ultrason Imaging. 2021 Nov;43(6):320-328. doi: 10.1177/01617346211041023. Epub 2021 Aug 26. Ultrason Imaging. 2021. PMID: 34433322
-
Prevalence of ultrasound synovial inflammatory findings in healthy subjects.Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1819-23. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208103. Epub 2015 Nov 27. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016. PMID: 26613767
-
A pilot investigation of the prevalence of US-detectable forefoot joint pathology and reported foot-related disability in participants with systemic lupus erythematosus.J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Aug 2;9:27. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0158-1. eCollection 2016. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016. PMID: 27486482 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Ultrasound of the forefeet besides the hands in patients at risk for rheumatoid arthritis: is it worth the effort? A longitudinal cohort study.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Apr 1;64(4):1643-1650. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae339. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025. PMID: 38897668 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Grassi W (2003) Clinical evaluation versus ultrasonography: who is the winner? J Rheumatol 30(5):908–909 - PubMed
-
- Kane D, Balint PV, Sturrock RD (2003) Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localization of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 30(5):966–971 - PubMed
-
- McAlindon T, Kissin E, Nazarian L, Ranganath V, Prakash S, Taylor M, Bannuru RR, Srinivasan S, Gogia M, McMahon MA, Grossman J, Kafaja S, FitzGerald J (2012) American college of rheumatology report on reasonable use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography in rheumatology clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64(11):1625–1640. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21836 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Möller I, Janta I, Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Bong DA, Martinoli C, Filippucci E, Sconfienza LM, Terslev L, Damjanov N, Hammer HB, Sudol-Szopinska I, Grassi W, Balint P, Bruyn GAW, D’Agostino MA, Hollander D, Siddle HJ, Supp G, Schmidt WA, Iagnocco A, Koski J, Kane D, Fodor D, Bruns A, Mandl P, Kaeley GS, Micu M, Ho C, Vlad V, Chávez-López M, Filippou G, Cerón CE, Nestorova R, Quintero M, Wakefield R, Carmona L, Naredo E (2017) The 2017 EULAR standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 76(12):1974–1979. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211585 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Frontera WR (2017) Physiologic changes of the musculoskeletal system with aging: a brief review. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 28(4):705–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2017.06.004 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous