Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;36(11):797-804.
doi: 10.1007/s10822-022-00477-y. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

From oncoproteins to spike proteins: the evaluation of intramolecular stability using hydropathic force field

Affiliations

From oncoproteins to spike proteins: the evaluation of intramolecular stability using hydropathic force field

Federica Agosta et al. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Evaluation of the intramolecular stability of proteins plays a key role in the comprehension of their biological behavior and mechanism of action. Small structural alterations such as mutations induced by single nucleotide polymorphism can impact biological activity and pharmacological modulation. Covid-19 mutations, that affect viral replication and the susceptibility to antibody neutralization, and the action of antiviral drugs, are just one example. In this work, the intramolecular stability of mutated proteins, like Spike glycoprotein and its complexes with the human target, is evaluated through hydropathic intramolecular energy scoring originally conceived by Abraham and Kellogg based on the "Extension of the fragment method to calculate amino acid zwitterion and side-chain partition coefficients" by Abraham and Leo in Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 1987, 2:130 - 52. HINT is proposed as a fast and reliable tool for the stability evaluation of any mutated system. This work has been written in honor of Prof. Donald J. Abraham (1936-2021).

Keywords: Intramolecular stability; LogPo/w; Mutations; Scoring function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
 K and N-RAS Intramolecular HINT score. K-RAS: The intramolecular stabilities of the mutated inactive (PDB ID: 5W22) and active (PDB ID: 6GOD) conformations of K-RAS were calculated. G12C, G12D, G12V, G13D, G13C, and Q61H are the most stable K-RAS closed conformations and present the highest experimental frequency. H-RAS: The intramolecular stability of the mutated inactive (PDB ID: 6WGH) and active (PDB ID: 5UHV) conformations reveal that G12D, G12S, and Q61R are the most stable and frequent N-RAS closed conformations [16].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
H-RAS structures and Intramolecular HINT score. Three different conformations of H-RAS were identified: an inactive GDP-bound conformation (blue) (PDB ID: 4Q21), an active state 1 conformation (orange) (PDB ID: 3RSO), and an active state 2 conformation (grey) (PDB ID: 5P21). The ΔHINT score between the mutated and the wild-type structure was calculated considering all three possible conformations. Only state 2 active conformation is stabilized by mutations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
B-RAF Intramolecular HINT scores. The ΔHINT score between mutated and wildtype structure (PDB ID: 6XFP) was calculated. All mutated forms are more stable than the wild-type ones. V599D is the most stable and presents the higher experimental kinase activity
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Intramolecular HINT output file. The output file shows each atom-atom interaction and the total intramolecular score with a detailed description of the single energy contribution (hydrogen bond, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, and negative contributions). In this capture, for example, the mutated ARG12 establishes two different hydrogen bonds with the residue GLU62.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Intramolecular HINT score of Spike proteins. All mutants generated from the trimeric wildtype closed conformation (PDB ID: 6VXX) are as stable as the wild type. RBD HINT score reveals higher stability of mutants than wildtype. Alpha and Omicron variants present a higher affinity toward ACE2, and their complexes are the most stable

References

    1. Anfinsen CB (1973) “Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains,” Science (1979), vol. 181, no. 4096, pp. 223–230, Jul. 10.1126/science.181.4096.223 - PubMed
    1. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG (1995) “Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 167–195, Mar. 10.1002/prot.340210302 - PubMed
    1. Godoy-Ruiz R, Perez-Jimenez R, Ibarra-Molero B, Sanchez-Ruiz JM (Feb. 2004) Relation Between Protein Stability, Evolution and Structure, as Probed by Carboxylic Acid Mutations. J Mol Biol 336(2):313–318. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.048 - PubMed
    1. Goldstein RA (2011) “The evolution and evolutionary consequences of marginal thermostability in proteins,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 1396–1407, May 10.1002/prot.22964 - PubMed
    1. Kucukkal TG, Petukh M, Li L, Alexov E (2015) “Structural and physico-chemical effects of disease and non-disease nsSNPs on proteins,” Curr Opin Struct Biol, vol. 32, pp. 18–24, Jun. 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.01.003 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources