Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;17(3):811-826.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01461-2. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

Volume-outcome relationship in intra-abdominal robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review

Elizabeth K Day  1 , Norman J Galbraith  2 , Hester J T Ward  3 , Campbell S Roxburgh  2
Affiliations
Free article

Volume-outcome relationship in intra-abdominal robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review

Elizabeth K Day et al. J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

As robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) expands to smaller centres, platforms are shared between specialities. Healthcare providers must consider case volume and mix required to maintain quality and cost-effectiveness. This can be informed, in-part, by the volume-outcome relationship. We perform a systematic review to describe the volume-outcome relationship in intra-abdominal robotic-assisted surgery to report on suggested minimum volumes standards. A literature search of Medline, NICE Evidence Search, Health Technology Assessment Database and Cochrane Library using the terms: "robot*", "surgery", "volume" and "outcome" was performed. The included procedures were gynecological: hysterectomy, urological: partial and radical nephrectomy, cystectomy, prostatectomy, and general surgical: colectomy, esophagectomy. Hospital and surgeon volume measures and all reported outcomes were analysed. 41 studies, including 983,149 procedures, met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and the retrieved data was synthesised in a narrative review. Significant volume-outcome relationships were described in relation to key outcome measures, including operative time, complications, positive margins, lymph node yield and cost. Annual surgeon and hospital volume thresholds were described. We concluded that in centres with an annual volume of fewer than 10 cases of a given procedure, having multiple surgeons performing these procedures led to worse outcomes and, therefore, opportunities should be sought to perform other complimentary robotic procedures or undertake joint cases.

Keywords: Outcome; Robotic-assisted surgery; Volume.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M (2018) Estimation of the acquisition and operating costs for robotic surgery. JAMA 153(4):e176233. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.9219 - DOI
    1. Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3(1):e1918911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC (1979) Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 301(25):1364–1369. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197912203012503 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, Stukel TA, Lucas FE, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl JMed 301:1364–1369. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa012337 - DOI
    1. Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A (2007) A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg 94(2):145–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5714 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types