Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Oct;10(10):e004235.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004235.

First-in-human phase I/II, open-label study of the anti-OX40 agonist INCAGN01949 in patients with advanced solid tumors

Elizabeth J Davis  1 , Juan Martin-Liberal  2 , Rebecca Kristeleit  3 , Daniel C Cho  4 , Sarah P Blagden  5 , Dominik Berthold  6 , Dana B Cardin  1 , Maria Vieito  2 , Rowan E Miller  7 , Prashanth Hari Dass  8 , Angela Orcurto  6 , Kristen Spencer  9 , John E Janik  10 , Jason Clark  10 , Thomas Condamine  10 , Jennifer Pulini  10 , Xuejun Chen  10 , Janice M Mehnert  11
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

First-in-human phase I/II, open-label study of the anti-OX40 agonist INCAGN01949 in patients with advanced solid tumors

Elizabeth J Davis et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: OX40 is a costimulatory receptor upregulated on antigen-activated T cells and constitutively expressed on regulatory T cells (Tregs). INCAGN01949, a fully human immunoglobulin G1κ anti-OX40 agonist monoclonal antibody, was designed to promote tumor-specific immunity by effector T-cell activation and Fcγ receptor-mediated Treg depletion. This first-in-human study was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of INCAGN01949.

Methods: Phase I/II, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Patients received INCAGN01949 monotherapy (7-1400 mg) in 14-day cycles while deriving benefit. Safety measures, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects were assessed and summarized with descriptive statistics.

Results: Eighty-seven patients were enrolled; most common tumor types were colorectal (17.2%), ovarian (8.0%), and non-small cell lung (6.9%) cancers. Patients received a median three (range 1-9) prior therapies, including immunotherapy in 24 patients (27.6%). Maximum tolerated dose was not reached; one patient (1.1%) receiving 350 mg dose reported dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 colitis. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 45 patients (51.7%), with fatigue (16 (18.4%)), rash (6 (6.9%)), and diarrhea (6 (6.9%)) being most frequent. One patient (1.1%) with metastatic gallbladder cancer achieved a partial response (duration of 6.3 months), and 23 patients (26.4%) achieved stable disease (lasting >6 months in one patient). OX40 receptor occupancy was maintained over 90% among all patients receiving doses of ≥200 mg, while no treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies were detected across all dose levels. Pharmacodynamic results demonstrated that treatment with INCAGN01949 did not enhance proliferation or activation of T cells in peripheral blood or reduce circulating Tregs, and analyses of tumor biopsies did not demonstrate any consistent increase in effector T-cell infiltration or function, or decrease in infiltrating Tregs.

Conclusion: No safety concerns were observed with INCAGN01949 monotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced solid tumors. However, tumor responses and pharmacodynamic effects on T cells in peripheral blood and post-therapy tumor biopsies were limited. Studies evaluating INCAGN01949 in combination with other therapies are needed to further evaluate the potential of OX40 agonism as a therapeutic approach in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Trial registration number: NCT02923349.

Keywords: Clinical Trials as Topic; Immunomodulation; Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating; T-Lymphocytes; Tumor Microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: EJD reports research funding (institution) from Actuate, BMS, FivePrime, Genentech, Incyte, Karyopharm and TopAlliance Biosciences; honoraria from MJH Life Sciences; and advisory role for Deciphera. JM-L reports lecture fees from Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi; advisory fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Highlight Therapeutics, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Sanofi; research grants from Sanofi; travel grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer and Roche. RK reports grants from MSD, Clovis and MSD; advisory role for Basilea, PharmaMar; advisory fees from AstraZeneca, Clovis, Eisai, GSK, Incyte, iTEOS, Pfizer and Roche. DCC reports advisory role for HUYA, Nektar Therapeutics, Pfizer and Werewolf Pharmaceuticals. SPB reports research funding and honoraria from Nucana plc; advisory fees from Amphista and Ellipses; clinical trials funding from Astex, MSD, Redx Pharma, Roche and UCB. DB reports no competing interests. DBC reports advisory role with AbbVie and Rafael Pharmaceuticals; honoraria from OncLive/MJH Life Sciences; research funding (institution) from Advaxis, Array BioPharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corcept Therapeutics, EMD Serono, Incyte, Lilly, Rafael Pharmaceuticals and Synta; and travel, accommodations and expenses from AbbVie. MV reports advisory role with Debiopharm and Roche; and travel from Roche. REM reports advisory fees from AZD, Clovis Oncology, Ellipses, GSK, Merck and Shigoni; speakers' fees from AZD, Clovis Oncology, GSK and Roche. PHD and AO report no competing interests. KS reports advisory fees from QED Therapeutics. JEJ, JC and TC report former employment and stock ownership with Incyte. JP and XC report employment and stock ownership with Incyte. JMM reports grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Immunocore, Incyte, Macrogenics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Polynoma and Sanofi; advisory role with Amgen and Merck Sharp & Dohme; honoraria from EMD Serono and Pfizer; advisory board for Array BioPharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai/Merck, EMD Serono, Sanofi/Regeneron and Seagen.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition. aCohorts included patients enrolled in dose-escalation and safety-expansion populations. All doses (7–1400 mg) refer to INCAGN01949.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Best percentage change from baseline in target lesion size for individual patients in (A) dose-escalation and (B) safety-expansion populations. Upper limit of dotted line indicates criteria for progressive disease (≥20% increase in sum of target lesion diameters), and lower limit indicates criteria for partial response (≥30% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters).
Figure 3
Figure 3
T-cell activity in blood samples of patients treated with INCAGN01949. Fold change from baseline of (A) proliferating (Ki67+) T cells. (B) Activated/exhausted (PD-1+) T cells. (C) Tregs. C, cycle; D, day; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; Treg, regulatory T cell.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plasma protein analysis and transcriptomic analysis in tumor samples of patients treated with INCAGN01949. (A) Heat map of immune-related plasma protein expression. Log2-fold change in plasma proteins identified to be differentially expressed between C1D1 and either C1D2, C1D7, and/or C2D1 in the cohorts of 70, 200, and 350 mg. (B) Violin plot of biopsy CD8+ T cell-related gene expression. Gene expression was analyzed in biopsy samples collected at screening (pretreatment) and on treatment. Statistical significance was calculated using ANOVA F-test; genes depicted reached statistical significance (p<0.05). ANOVA, analysis of variance; C, cycle; D, day; GZMA, granzyme A; GZMB, granzyme B; GZMH, granzyme H; GZMM, granzyme M.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Frauwirth KA, Thompson CB. Activation and inhibition of lymphocytes by costimulation. J Clin Invest 2002;109:295–9. 10.1172/JCI0214941 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paluch C, Santos AM, Anzilotti C, et al. . Immune checkpoints as therapeutic targets in autoimmunity. Front Immunol 2018;9:2306. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02306 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guram K, Kim SS, Wu V, et al. . A threshold model for T-cell activation in the era of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2019;10:491. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00491 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Granier C, De Guillebon E, Blanc C, et al. . Mechanisms of action and rationale for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in cancer. ESMO Open 2017;2:e000213. 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000213 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Golay J, Andrea AE. Combined anti-cancer strategies based on anti-checkpoint inhibitor antibodies. Antibodies 2020;9:17. 10.3390/antib9020017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data