Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov 1;23(11):738-755.
doi: 10.1542/neo.23-10-e738.

Updates in Late-Onset Sepsis: Risk Assessment, Therapy, and Outcomes

Affiliations
Review

Updates in Late-Onset Sepsis: Risk Assessment, Therapy, and Outcomes

Sarah A Coggins et al. Neoreviews. .

Abstract

Neonatal late-onset sepsis (LOS) continues to threaten morbidity and mortality in the NICU and poses ongoing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Early recognition of clinical signs, rapid evaluation, and prompt initiation of treatment are critical to prevent life-threatening deterioration. Preterm infants-born at ever-decreasing gestational ages-are at particularly high risk for life-long morbidities and death. This changing NICU population necessitates continual reassessments of diagnostic and preventive measures and evidence-based treatment for LOS. The clinical presentation of LOS is varied and nonspecific. Despite ongoing research, reliable, specific laboratory biomarkers facilitating early diagnosis are lacking. These limitations drive an ongoing practice of liberal initiation of empiric antibiotics among infants with suspected LOS. Subsequent promotion of multidrug-resistant microorganisms threatens the future of antimicrobial therapy and puts preterm and chronically ill infants at even higher risk of nosocomial infection. Efforts to identify adjunctive therapies counteracting sepsis-driven hyperinflammation and sepsis-related functional immunosuppression are ongoing. However, most approaches have either failed to improve LOS prognosis or are not yet ready for clinical application. This article provides an overview of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic tools, and treatment options of LOS in the context of increasing numbers of extremely preterm infants. It addresses the question of whether LOS could be identified earlier and more precisely to allow for earlier and more targeted therapy and discusses rational approaches to antibiotic therapy to avoid overuse. Finally, this review elucidates the necessity of long-term follow-up of infants with a history of LOS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Etiology and Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Neonatal Late Onset Sepsis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2 Pt 1):285–291 - PubMed
    1. Boghossian NS, Page GP, Bell EF, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight infants from singleton and multiple-gestation births. J Pediatr. 2013;162(6):1120–1124 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah J, Jefferies AL, Yoon EW, et al. Risk Factors and outcomes of late-onset bacterial sepsis in preterm neonates born at < 32 weeks’ gestation. Am J Perinatol 2015;32(7):675–682 - PubMed
    1. Greenberg RG, Kandefer S, Do BT, et al. Late-onset sepsis in extremely premature infants: 2000–2011. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(8):774–779 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dong Y, Glaser K, Speer CP. Late-onset sepsis caused by Gram-negative bacteria in very low birth weight infants: a systematic review. Expert Rev Aanti-infective Therapy. 2019;17(3):177–188 - PubMed

Substances