Clinical evaluation for the pharyngeal oxygen saturation measurements in shocked patients
- PMID: 36316710
- PMCID: PMC9624017
- DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01073-z
Clinical evaluation for the pharyngeal oxygen saturation measurements in shocked patients
Abstract
Background: Monitoring oxygen saturation in shocked patients is a challenging nursing procedure. Shock syndrome alters peripheral tissue perfusion and hinders peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements. Our study aimed to find a solution to this problem. The pharynx is expected to be an accurate SpO2 measurement site in shocked patients. We clinically evaluated the pharyngeal SpO2 measurements against the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measurements.
Methods: A prospective cohort research design was used. This study included 168 adult shocked patients. They were admitted to five intensive care units from March to December 2020 in an Egyptian hospital. A wrap oximeter sensor was attached to the posterior surface of an oropharyngeal airway (OPA) by adhesive tape. The optical component of the sensor adhered to the pharyngeal surface after the OPA insertion. Simultaneous pharyngeal peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measurements were recorded. The pharyngeal SpO2 was clinically evaluated. Also, variables associated with the SpO2 bias were evaluated for their association with the pharyngeal SpO2 bias.
Results: The pharyngeal SpO2 bias was - 0.44% with - 1.65 to 0.78% limits of agreement. The precision was 0.62, and the accuracy was 0.05. The sensitivity to detect mild and severe hypoxemia was 100%, while specificity to minimize false alarm of hypoxemia was 100% for mild hypoxemia and 99.4% for severe hypoxemia. None of the studied variables were significantly associated with the pharyngeal SpO2 bias.
Conclusion: The pharyngeal SpO2 has a clinically acceptable bias, which is less than 0.5% with high precision, which is less than 2%.
Keywords: Hypoxia; Oximetry; Oxygen saturation; Pharynx; Sensitivity; Shock; Specificity.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A two centre observational study of simultaneous pulse oximetry and arterial oxygen saturation recordings in intensive care unit patients.Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018 May;46(3):297-303. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1804600307. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018. PMID: 29716488
-
Agreement between pulse oximetry and arterial oxygen saturation measurement in critical care patients during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Aug;37(4):977-984. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00959-2. Epub 2023 Jan 21. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023. PMID: 36670340 Free PMC article.
-
Study of Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry and Arterial Blood Gas in ICU Patients: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020 Oct 15;58(230):789-793. doi: 10.31729/jnma.5536. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020. PMID: 34504355 Free PMC article.
-
Impacts of Skin Color and Hypoxemia on Noninvasive Assessment of Peripheral Blood Oxygen Saturation: A Scoping Review.Cureus. 2023 Sep 27;15(9):e46078. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46078. eCollection 2023 Sep. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37900526 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of laminated disposable pulse-oximeter sensors.Respir Care. 1995 Jul;40(7):728-33. Respir Care. 1995. PMID: 10144067 Review.
References
-
- Seifi S, Khatony A, Moradi G, Abdi A, Najafi F. Accuracy of pulse oximetry in detection of oxygen saturation in patients admitted to the intensive care unit of heart surgery: comparison of finger, toe, forehead and earlobe probes. BMC Nurs. 2018;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12912-018-0283-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources