Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 1;21(1):290.
doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01073-z.

Clinical evaluation for the pharyngeal oxygen saturation measurements in shocked patients

Affiliations

Clinical evaluation for the pharyngeal oxygen saturation measurements in shocked patients

Eman Arafa Hassan et al. BMC Nurs. .

Abstract

Background: Monitoring oxygen saturation in shocked patients is a challenging nursing procedure. Shock syndrome alters peripheral tissue perfusion and hinders peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements. Our study aimed to find a solution to this problem. The pharynx is expected to be an accurate SpO2 measurement site in shocked patients. We clinically evaluated the pharyngeal SpO2 measurements against the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measurements.

Methods: A prospective cohort research design was used. This study included 168 adult shocked patients. They were admitted to five intensive care units from March to December 2020 in an Egyptian hospital. A wrap oximeter sensor was attached to the posterior surface of an oropharyngeal airway (OPA) by adhesive tape. The optical component of the sensor adhered to the pharyngeal surface after the OPA insertion. Simultaneous pharyngeal peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measurements were recorded. The pharyngeal SpO2 was clinically evaluated. Also, variables associated with the SpO2 bias were evaluated for their association with the pharyngeal SpO2 bias.

Results: The pharyngeal SpO2 bias was - 0.44% with - 1.65 to 0.78% limits of agreement. The precision was 0.62, and the accuracy was 0.05. The sensitivity to detect mild and severe hypoxemia was 100%, while specificity to minimize false alarm of hypoxemia was 100% for mild hypoxemia and 99.4% for severe hypoxemia. None of the studied variables were significantly associated with the pharyngeal SpO2 bias.

Conclusion: The pharyngeal SpO2 has a clinically acceptable bias, which is less than 0.5% with high precision, which is less than 2%.

Keywords: Hypoxia; Oximetry; Oxygen saturation; Pharynx; Sensitivity; Shock; Specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The pulse oximeter sensor attached to the posterior surface of the oropharyngeal airway
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Bland Altman plot for oxygen saturation measurements from arterial and pharyngeal sites

Similar articles

References

    1. Michard F. Hemodynamic monitoring: would a pulse oximeter do the job?*. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(2):383–6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004788. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Louie A, Feiner JR, Bickler PE, Rhodes L, Bernstein M, Lucero J. Four types of pulse oximeters accurately detect hypoxia during low perfusion and motion. Anesthesiology. 2018;128(3):520–30. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whitehead NS, Williams LO, Meleth S, Kennedy SM, Ubaka-Blackmoore N, Geaghan SM, et al. Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2511-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seifi S, Khatony A, Moradi G, Abdi A, Najafi F. Accuracy of pulse oximetry in detection of oxygen saturation in patients admitted to the intensive care unit of heart surgery: comparison of finger, toe, forehead and earlobe probes. BMC Nurs. 2018;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12912-018-0283-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Safar H, El-Dash H. Pulse oximetry: could wrist and ankle be alternative placement sites? Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2015;54(14):1375–9. doi: 10.1177/0009922815584217. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources