Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 26:10:e14000.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.14000. eCollection 2022.

Determining the hip joint isokinetic muscle strength and range of motion of professional soccer players based on their field position

Affiliations

Determining the hip joint isokinetic muscle strength and range of motion of professional soccer players based on their field position

Ali AlTaweel et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Background: Soccer players' physical and physiological demands vary based on their field position. Although the hip joint has an important role in soccer, little information is available about the strength and flexibility of the hip joint based on player positions. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the differences in muscle strength and flexibility of the hip joint of professional soccer players based on their field position.

Methods: Ninety-six professional soccer players from Saudi Arabia were divided into four groups (goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders, and attackers), with 24 participants in each group based on their field position. The Modified Thomas test was used to measure the hip extension range of motion (ROM), and muscle strength was assessed by an Isokinetic dynamometer.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the isokinetic strength at the hip joint movements between goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders, and attackers (p ≥ 0.05). At the same time, there was a significant difference between groups in the hip extension ROM (p ≤ 0.05). according to different player positions. Post hoc tests reported significant differences between goalkeepers and defenders (p ≤ 0.05), midfielders (p ≤ 0.05), and attackers p ≤ 0.05). At the same time, there were no significant differences between defenders and midfielders (p ≥ 0.05), defenders and attackers (p ≥ 0.05), and midfielders and attackers (p ≥ 0.05).

Conclusion: Even though there was no significant difference in isokinetic strength, there was a significant difference in hip extension ROM among players based on field position. This study may help coaches and trainers to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of players and design training programs to rectify the weaker components and improve players' performance in different playing positions.

Keywords: Flexibility; Physiological demand; Range of motion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Shibili Nuhmani is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Modified Thomas test assessment of hip extension ROM to assess hip flexor muscle flexibility.

References

    1. Al-Harbi SA, Muaidi QI, Ahsan M. Single-leg landing: Determining the risk of knee joint injuries in relation to frontal plane projection angles and lower leg muscle strength among recreational athletes. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2021;21:2105–2111. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2021.s3268. - DOI
    1. Amiri-Khorasani M, Osman NAA, Yusof A. Acute effect of static and dynamic stretching on hip dynamic range of motion during instep kicking in professional soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011;25:1647–1652. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181db9f41. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bloomfield J, Polman R, Butterly R, O’Donoghue P. Analysis of age, stature, body mass, BMI and quality of elite soccer players from 4 European Leagues. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2005;45:58–67. - PubMed
    1. Buchheit M, Mendez-Villanueva A, Simpson BM, Bourdon PC. Match running performance and fitness in youth soccer. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010;31(11):818–825. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262838. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cady K, Powis M, Hopgood K. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the modified Thomas Test. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2022;29:86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.09.014. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources