doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18453.
Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs
Affiliations
- PMID: 36318123
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.18453
Item in Clipboard
Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs
JAMA.
.
No abstract available
Plain language summary
This Viewpoint discusses the ways in which the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which triggered abortion bans or restrictions in half of states, presents serious legal risks to clinicians and major ethical dilemmas.
Comment in
-
Health Care Access and Reproductive Rights.JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1707-1709. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.19172. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36318152 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Post-Roe v Wade psychiatry: legal, clinical, and ethical challenges in psychiatry under abortion bans.Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;11(10):853-862. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00096-8. Epub 2024 May 22. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38795722 Review.
-
Obstacles to Care Mount 1 Year After Dobbs Decision.JAMA. 2023 Jul 11;330(2):119-120. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10151. JAMA. 2023. PMID: 37351896
-
Trends in Medical Students' Legal Concerns Regarding Abortion Care in the Wake of the 2022 Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.South Med J. 2025 Jan;118(1):26-30. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001773. South Med J. 2025. PMID: 39753233
-
State Abortion Policy and Moral Distress Among Clinicians Providing Abortion After the Dobbs Decision.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26248. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39088213 Free PMC article.
-
Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;127(2):313-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001251. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26942359 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Ethical research when abortion access is legally restricted.Science. 2023 Jun 23;380(6651):1224-1226. doi: 10.1126/science.adh3104. Epub 2023 Jun 22. Science. 2023. PMID: 37347876 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of New and Renewed Restrictive State Abortion Laws on Pregnancy-Capable People with Diabetes.Curr Diab Rep. 2023 Aug;23(8):175-184. doi: 10.1007/s11892-023-01512-4. Epub 2023 May 22. Curr Diab Rep. 2023. PMID: 37213059 Review.
-
Drivers of care and outcomes for people facing fetal conditions in the United States: a conceptual framework.J Perinatol. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02340-y. Online ahead of print. J Perinatol. 2025. PMID: 40604318 Review.
-
Blood Borders: State laws, vaccine misinformation, and the threat to the United States blood supply.Transfusion. 2025 Aug;65(8):1534-1542. doi: 10.1111/trf.18312. Epub 2025 Jun 16. Transfusion. 2025. PMID: 40521642 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Prevalence of childfree adults before and after Dobbs v Jackson in Michigan (USA).PLoS One. 2024 Jan 10;19(1):e0294459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294459. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38198441 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
