Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs
- PMID: 36318123
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.18453
Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs
Plain language summary
This Viewpoint discusses the ways in which the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which triggered abortion bans or restrictions in half of states, presents serious legal risks to clinicians and major ethical dilemmas.
Comment in
-
Health Care Access and Reproductive Rights.JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1707-1709. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.19172. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36318152 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
