Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;197(1):39-49.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06756-4. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

Identifying research priorities in breast cancer surgery: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance

Shelley Potter #  1   2 , Katherine Fairhurst #  3   4 , Katherine Cowan  5   6 , Simon Vincent  7 , Ian Lewis  8 , Ramsey I Cutress  9 , Hilary Stobart  10 , Patricia Fairbrother  10 , Sophia Turner  10 , Kayleigh Davies-Crowley  11 , Ranjeet Jeevan  12 , Tim Rattay  13 , Rachel O'Connell  14 , Nigel Bundred  12   15 , Stuart A McIntosh  16
Affiliations
Review

Identifying research priorities in breast cancer surgery: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance

Shelley Potter et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership was developed to identify research priorities in breast cancer surgery from individuals with lived experience, at high genetic risk of breast cancer, and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Methods: 'Uncertainties' were collected using an online survey. Following an evidence check and development of summary questions, an interim survey asked participants to rank their top 10 research priorities from the question list. Top-ranked questions from patient/carer, high-risk and professional groups were carried forward for discussion to a final online prioritisation workshop.

Results: 260 participants (101 patients/carers, 156 HCPs) submitted 940 uncertainties via the initial survey. These were analysed thematically into 128 summary questions in six topic areas. Following evidence checking, 59 questions were included in the interim survey which was completed by 572 respondents. Marked differences were seen in questions prioritised by patients/carers, HCPs and women at high-risk. The top eight priorities in patient/carer and professional groups and top two priorities for high-risk women were carried forward to the online workshop at which 22 participants discussed and agreed the final top 10. Key themes included de-escalation of breast and axillary surgery, factors impacting the development/detection of locoregional recurrence and optimal provision of support for informed treatment decision-making.

Conclusion: The top 10 research priorities in breast cancer surgery have been agreed. However, the observed differences in research priorities identified by patients and professional groups were not anticipated. Top priorities from both groups should inform future UK breast cancer surgical research, to ensure that it addresses questions that are important to breast cancer community as a whole.

Keywords: Breast cancer surgery; Consensus; James Lind Alliance; Research priorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RIC reports institutional research funding from SECA and Astra Zeneca. SMcI reports institutional research funding from Novartis and Sanofi, advisory boards for Roche and Lilly, honoraria from Roche, BD and Daiichi-Sankyo, and conference travel and support from Roche and Lilly. The remaining authors declare they have no relevant financial or non-financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram summarising breast cancer surgery priority setting partnership process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of submitted questions by topic and respondent group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cancer Research UK. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s... 2019 [Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s....
    1. Cancer IAfRo. Cancer today: Estimated number of new cases in 2020, worldwide, both sexes, all ages (excl. NMSC) 2022 [Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-table?v=2020&mode=cancer&mode_....
    1. Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, Harewood R, Spika D, Wang XS, et al. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2) Lancet. 2015;385(9972):977–1010. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62038-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS, Armes J, Berditchevski F, et al. Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(5):R92. doi: 10.1186/bcr3493. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cutress R, McIntosh S, Potter S, Goyal A, Kirwan C, Harvey J, et al. Opportunities and priorities for breast surgical research. Lancet Oncol. 2018 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30511-4. - DOI - PubMed