Attrition from pediatric trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 36320164
- DOI: 10.1002/jts.22890
Attrition from pediatric trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) is one of the leading interventions for trauma-exposed children and adolescents and is associated with significant improvements in a variety of trauma-related symptoms. Nonetheless, attrition from TF-CBT is quite common, and children who do not receive the full intervention may continue to suffer from trauma-related symptoms. Rates of premature termination have varied across studies, and to date, no meta-analyses have been conducted regarding dropout from TF-CBT. The objective of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the rates of attrition from TF-CBT, as well as review factors related to premature termination from this intervention. A total of 22 studies were available for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The prevalence of attrition was 33.9% (95% CI [26.2%, 42.5%]) from 2,059 children receiving TF-CBT. Clinician-rated attrition was 38.5%, and 17.5% did not receive an adequate dose of TF-CBT (e.g., 12+ sessions). Further, the study type was related to differing rates of dropout, with randomized controlled trials having a much lower attrition rate. Regarding risk factors for premature termination, the emerging literature suggests that a child's age, racial-ethnic minority status, and symptom levels may evince some ties to attrition. Caregiver, family, therapist, and treatment factors remain underexplored in relation to premature termination; however, preliminary work suggests that lack of caregiver attendance and difficulty in the child-therapist relationship may be related to attrition. A substantial number of children prematurely terminate from TF-CBT, underscoring the need to better prevent dropout.
Keywords: Child, Evidence-based intervention; Family, Treatment outcome.
© 2022 International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.
References
REFERENCES
-
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
-
- Armbruster, P., & Kazdin, A. E. (1994). Attrition in child psychotherapy. In T.H. Ollendick & R. J. Prinz (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 81-108). Plenum.
-
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2013). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 3). Biostat.
-
- Bowden, J., Tierney, J. F., Copas, A. J., & Burdett, S. (2011). Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised statistics. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-41
-
- Cary, C. E., & McMillen, J. C. (2012). The data behind the dissemination: A systematic review of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for use with children and youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 748-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.003
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
