Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 6;12(44):28505-28518.
doi: 10.1039/d2ra04947c. eCollection 2022 Oct 4.

Chronoampermetric detection of enzymatic glucose sensor based on doped polyindole/MWCNT composites modified onto screen-printed carbon electrode as portable sensing device for diabetes

Affiliations

Chronoampermetric detection of enzymatic glucose sensor based on doped polyindole/MWCNT composites modified onto screen-printed carbon electrode as portable sensing device for diabetes

Katesara Phasuksom et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Doped-polyindole (dPIn) mixed with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were coated on a screen-printed electrode to improve the electroactive surface area and current response of the chronoamperometric enzymatic glucose sensor. Glucose oxidase mixed with chitosan (CHI-GOx) was immobilized on the electrode. (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES) was used as a linker between the CHI-GOx and the dPIn. The current response of the glucose sensor increased with increasing glucose concentration according to a power law relation. The sensitivity of the CHI-GOx/APTES/dPIn was 55.7 μA mM-1 cm-2 with an LOD (limit of detection) of 0.01 mM, where the detectable glucose concentration range was 0.01-50 mM. The sensitivity of the CHI-GOx/APTES/1.5%MWCNT-dPIn was 182.9 μA mM-1 cm-2 with an LOD of 0.01 mM, where the detectable glucose concentration range was 0.01-100 mM. The detectable concentration ranges of glucose well cover the glucose concentrations in urine and blood. The fabricated enzymatic glucose sensors showed high stability during a storage period of four weeks and high selectivity relative to other interferences. Moreover, the sensor was successfully demonstrated as a continuous or step-wise glucose monitoring device. The preparation method employed here was facile and suitable for large quantity production. The glucose sensor fabricated here, consisting of the three-electrode cell of SPCE, were simple to use for glucose detection. Thus, it is promising to use as a prototype for real glucose monitoring for diabetic patients in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. (a) Working electrode modification steps to prepare the CHI-GOx/APTES/1.5%MWCNT-dPIn; and (b) hydrolysis of APTES.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1. ATR-FTIR analysis of (A-a) dPIn; (A-b) APTES/dPIn; (A-c) CHI-GOx/APTES/dPIn; (B-a) 1.5%MWCNT-dPIn; (B-b) APTES/1.5%MWCNT-dPIn; (B-c) CHI-GOx/APTES/1.5%MWCNT-dPIn; (A-d) or (B-d) GOx; and (A-e) or (B-e) CHI.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Surface morphologies at 300 00× of magnification of various modified SPCEs: (a) SPCE; (b) b-SPCE; and the b-SPCE modified with various chemicals; (c) dPIn; (d) CHI-GOx/APTES/dPIn; (e) 1.5%MWCNT-dPIn; (f) CHI-GOx/APTES/1.5%MWCNT-dPIn.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Electrochemical analysis: (a) cyclic voltammograms; and (b) Nyquist plots of various modified electrodes with the inset. The anodic peaks current vs. the square root of scan rates (ν0.5) and insets of cyclic voltammograms with different scan rates of: (c) CHI-GOx/APTES/dPIn; and (d) CHI-GOx/APTES/1.5%MWCNT-dPIn. The electrodes were tested in a solution of 5 mM of K3[Fe(CN6)]/K4[Fe(CN6)] containing 0.1 M PBS solution (pH 7.4) and 0.1 M KCl.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. (a) Cyclic voltammograms in a solution of 5 mM of K3[Fe(CN6)]/K4[Fe(CN6)] containing 0.1 M PBS solution (pH 7.4) and 0.1 M KCl; and (b) current changes (ΔI = Iglc-IPBS) at +0.6 V in 1 mM and 10 mM glucose solutions of the dPIn mixed with various concentrations of MWCNT solutions.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. (a) Components of SPCE; and (b) the possible glucose mechanism of the fabricated glucose sensor.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Chronoamperometric current responses vs. time at +0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl and the current change (ΔI = Iglc-IPBS) vs. glucose concentration (C, mM) of: (a), (c) CHI-GOx/APTES/dPIn; and (b), (d) CHI-GOx/APTES/1.5%MWCNT-dPIn. Inset in figures (c) and (d) are logarithmic scale of ΔI vs. C.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Continuous current response vs. time at +0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl in various glucose concentrations of: (a) CHI-GOx/APTES/1.5%MWCNT-dPIn; and (b) CHI-GOx/APTES/dPIn.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Electrochemical characterization by in 1 mM glucose solution: cyclic voltammograms and the anodic and cathodic currents vs. scan rate of (a) and (b) for CHI-GOx/APTES/dPIn; and (c) and (d) for CHI-GOx/APTES/1.5%MWCNT-dPIn.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. (a) Electrode reproducibility; (b) electrode repeatability; (c) electrode stability at different storage times at 4 °C, the electrodes were tested in 1 mM glucose solution; and (d) selectivity in 1 mM of interference chemicals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hwang D.-W. Lee S. Seo M. Chung T. D. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2018;1033:1–34. - PubMed
    1. Bruen D. Delaney C. Florea L. Diamond D. Sensors. 2017;17:1866. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim J. Campbell A. S. Wang J. Talanta. 2018;177:163–170. - PubMed
    1. Sridara T. Upan J. Saianand G. Tuantranont A. Karuwan C. Jakmunee J. Sensors. 2020;20:808. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Safavi A. Farjami F. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011;26:2547–2552. - PubMed