Secundiparas following a failed vacuum delivery-factors associated with a successful vaginal delivery: a historical prospective cohort
- PMID: 36324097
- PMCID: PMC9632100
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05151-7
Secundiparas following a failed vacuum delivery-factors associated with a successful vaginal delivery: a historical prospective cohort
Abstract
Background: Few studies have focused on the delivery subsequent to a failed vacuum delivery (failed-VD) in secundiparas. The objective of the current study was to examine the factors associated with a vaginal delivery following a failed-VD.
Methods: An historical prospective cohort. Obstetric characteristics of secundiparas who underwent a planned caesarean delivery (CD) were compared to those who elected a trial of labour (TOLAC) at single medical-centre, throughout 2006-2019. The latter were further analysed to study for factures associated with successful vaginal birth (VBAC).
Results: Among the 115 secundiparas included, 89 (77%) underwent TOLAC. Compared to women who underwent an elective CD, those who underwent TOLAC were younger by a mean of 4 years, were more likely to have conceived spontaneously, and had a more advanced gestation by a mean of 10 days. VBAC was achieved in 62 women (70%). New-borns of women with VBAC had in average a lower birth weight compared to those with failed TOLAC, (-)195 g ± 396 g versus ( +)197 g ± 454 g respectively, P < 0.01. Having a higher neonatal birthweight at P2 by increments of 500 g, 400 g or 300 g was associated with a failed TOLAC; OR of 9.7 (95%CI; 2.3, 40.0), 11.5 (95%CI; 2.8, 46.7) and 4.5 (95%CI; 1.4, 13.9), respectively.
Conclusions: Among secundiparas with a previous CD due to a failed-VD, the absolute difference of neonatal BW was found to be significantly associated with achieving VBAC.
Keywords: Birthweight; Failed vacuum-delivery; TOLAC; VBAC.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The Authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Risk of anal sphincter injury in trial of labor post cesarean section.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jan;100(1):147-153. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13977. Epub 2020 Sep 26. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021. PMID: 32853395
-
Factors associated with the outcome of TOLAC after one previous caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Apr;42(3):430-436. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1916451. Epub 2021 Jun 21. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 34151688
-
[Influencing factors and antenatal assessment of the vaginal birth after cesarean section].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 25;54(6):369-374. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.06.003. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31262120 Chinese.
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
-
Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies after a previous cesarean delivery-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Birth. 2019 Dec;46(4):550-559. doi: 10.1111/birt.12434. Epub 2019 May 23. Birth. 2019. PMID: 31124186
References
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(1):1–65. - PubMed
-
- Thomas J, Paranjothy S. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG . 2001. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/93112/1/nscs_audit.pdf.
-
- Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, Landon MB, Galan HL, Jauniaux ERM, et al. Obstetrics: Normal and problem pregnancies. 7. Philadelphia: Elsevier - Health Sciences Division; 2016.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical