Snacking for a reason: detangling effects of socio-economic position and stress on snacking behaviour
- PMID: 36324118
- PMCID: PMC9628631
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14384-2
Snacking for a reason: detangling effects of socio-economic position and stress on snacking behaviour
Abstract
Background: As snacking can be considered a cornerstone of an unhealthy diet, investigating psychological drivers of snacking behaviour is urgent, and therefore the purpose of this study. Socio-economic position (SEP) and stress are known to affect many behaviours and outcomes, and were therefore focal points in the study.
Methods: In a cross-sectional survey study, we examined whether Socio-economic position (SEP) would amplify associations between heightened stress levels and self-reported negative-affect related reasons for snacking. Next, we investigated whether Socio-economic position (SEP) predicted frequency of snacking behaviour, and how stress and other reasons for snacking could explain this association. Outcome measures were reasons people indicated for snacking, and frequency of snacking behaviour.
Results: Analyses revealed that people seem to find more reasons to snack when they are stressed, and that this association was more pronounced for people with a high compared to low socio-economic position. Furthermore, a higher socio-economic position was associated with a higher frequency of snacking, and both snacking to reward oneself and snacking because of the opportunity to do so remained significant mediators.
Conclusion: Whereas low socio-economic position was associated with higher stress levels, this did not translate into increased snacking. Contrarily, those with higher socio-economic position could be more prone to using 'reasons to snack', which may result in justification of unhealthy snacking behaviour.
Keywords: COVID-19 related worry; Life stress; Reasons for snacking; Snacking behaviour; Socio-economic position.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Piernas C, Popkin BM. Snacking Increased among U.S. Adults between 1977 and 2006. J Nutr [Internet]. 2010 Feb 1 [cited 2021 Mar 31];140(2):325–32. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/140/2/325/4688951. - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. 2021.
-
- Taylor SE, Repetti RL, Seeman T. Health psychology: What is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin? Annu Rev Psychol [Internet]. 1997 Feb 28 [cited 2021 Mar 24];48(1):411–47. Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.411. - PubMed
-
- Orr CJ, Keyserling TC, Ammerman AS, Berkowitz SA. Diet quality trends among adults with diabetes by socioeconomic status in the U.S.: 1999–2014. BMC Endocrine Disorders 2019 19:1 [Internet]. 2019 May 31 [cited 2021 Oct 22];19(1):1–9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/articles/10.1186/s12902-019-0382-3. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials