Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 29;14(9):e29753.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.29753. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Comparative Evaluation of Different Post Materials on Stress Distribution in Endodontically Treated Teeth Using the Finite Element Analysis Method: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Comparative Evaluation of Different Post Materials on Stress Distribution in Endodontically Treated Teeth Using the Finite Element Analysis Method: A Systematic Review

Vijetha Badami et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and conclude findings to reveal the stress ranges developed by various post materials by finite element analysis. This, in turn, aids in the selection of better post material clinically. The electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar were searched in this review by using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among 14586 articles, 22 articles were included in this systematic review, as they satisfied the eligibility criteria. The search covered all articles published from 1997 to December 2021. All records identified were retrieved and imported into the Rayyan bibliographic software, which is a systematic review screening software. Later, data extraction and analysis of 22 articles were done. Twenty-two articles, which were all finite element analysis studies, were included. Among these, 18 studies used maxillary central incisor scanned models, two studies used a maxillary canine model, and the remaining two used the mandibular premolar model for finite element analysis. All these tooth models are restored with post models made of different materials. This systematic review revealed a difference in stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth when using different post materials. Among 22 studies, 15 studies evaluated glass fiber posts and the results showed that they induce less stress on restored endodontically treated teeth when compared to other posts, with maximum stress concentration at the cervical third of the root. Prefabricated posts like stainless steel and Titanium showed more stress on the restored tooth structure with stress concentration at the cervical and apical third of the root. Prefabricated zirconia also showed more stress on the restored tooth with maximum stress concentration at the middle third of the root.

Keywords: fiber post; finite element analysis; post materials; stress distribution; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow Chart of the Search Strategy Used in This Systematic Review

References

    1. Evaluation of stress distribution in an endodontically treated tooth restored with four different post systems and two different crowns- a finite element analysis. Nahar R, Mishra SK, Chowdhary R. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10:719–726. - PMC - PubMed
    1. A review on post and core. Kalra H, Sukhija H, Roy Rassawet R, Rani V. Sch J Dent Sci. 2020;7:51–56.
    1. Comparative evaluation of the effect of different post and core materials on stress distribution in radicular dentin by three-dimensional finite element analysis. Nokar S, Bahrami M, Mostafavi AS. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc6026308/ J Dent (Tehran) 2018;15:69–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Effects of post core materials on stress distribution in the restoration of mandibular second premolars: a finite element analysis. Durmuş G, Oyar P. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:547–554. - PubMed
    1. Elastic modulus of posts and the risk of root fracture. Meira JB, Espósito CO, Quitero MF, Poiate IA, Pfeifer CS, Tanaka CB, Ballester RY. Dent Traumatol. 2009;25:394–398. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources