Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 11;23(4):392-408.
doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2044425. eCollection 2022.

Setting a research agenda in trans health: An expert assessment of priorities and issues by trans and nonbinary researchers

Jaimie F Veale  1 , Madeline B Deutsch  2 , Aaron H Devor  3 , Laura E Kuper  4   5 , Joz Motmans  6   7 , Asa E Radix  8   9 , Colt St Amand  10   11   12
Affiliations
Review

Setting a research agenda in trans health: An expert assessment of priorities and issues by trans and nonbinary researchers

Jaimie F Veale et al. Int J Transgend Health. .

Abstract

Background: This article is by a group of trans and nonbinary researchers and experts in the field of trans health who have conducted an analysis of trans health research needs.

Aims: To highlight topics that need further research and to outline key considerations for those conducting research in our field.

Methods: The first author conducted semi-structured interviews with all coauthors, and these were used to create a first draft of this manuscript. This draft was circulated to all authors, with edits made until consensus was reached among the authors.

Results: More comprehensive long-term research that centers trans people's experiences is needed on the risks and benefits of gender affirming hormones and surgeries. The trans health research field also needs to have a broader focus beyond medical transition or gender affirmation, including general health and routine healthcare; trans people's lives without, before, and after medical gender affirmation; and sexuality, fertility, and reproductive healthcare needs. More research is also needed on social determinants of health, including ways to make healthcare settings and other environments safer and more supportive; social and legal gender recognition; the needs of trans people who are most marginalized; and the ways in which healing happens within trans communities. The second part of this article highlights key considerations for researchers, the foremost being acknowledging trans community expertise and centering trans community members' input into research design and interpretation of findings, in advisory and/or researcher roles. Ethical considerations include maximizing benefits and minimizing harms (beneficence) and transparency and accountability to trans communities. Finally, we note the importance of conferences, grant funding, working with students, and multidisciplinary teams.

Discussion: This article outlines topics and issues needing further consideration to make the field of trans health research more responsive to the needs of trans people. This work is limited by our authorship group being mostly White, all being Anglophone, and residing in the Global North.

Keywords: Trans health; ethics; gender affirming healthcare; social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

    1. Adams, N., Pearce, R., Veale, J. F., Radix, A., Castro, D., Sarkar, A., & Thom, K. C. (2017). Guidance and ethical considerations for undertaking transgender health research and Institutional Review Boards adjudicating this research. Transgender Health, 2(1), 165–175. 10.1089/trgh.2017.0012 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association . (2015). Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. American Psychologist, 70(9), 832–864. 10.1037/a0039906 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ansara, Y. G., & Hegarty, P. (2012). Cisgenderism in psychology: Pathologising and misgendering children from 1999 to 2008. Psychology and Sexuality, 3(2), 137–160. 10.1080/19419899.2011.576696 - DOI
    1. Ashley, F. (2020). Homophobia, conversion therapy, and care models for trans youth: Defending the gender-affirmative approach. Journal of LGBT Youth, 17(4), 361–383. 10.1080/19361653.2019.1665610 - DOI
    1. Bauer, G. R., Devor, A. H., Heinz, M., Marshall, J., Pullen Sansfaçon, A., & Pyne, J. (2019). CPATH ethical guidelines for research involving transgender people & communities. Canadian Professional Association for Transgender Health. https://cpath.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CPATH-Ethical-Guidelines-EN.pdf

LinkOut - more resources