Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 17:13:979742.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.979742. eCollection 2022.

Transgene-free genome editing and RNAi ectopic application in fruit trees: Potential and limitations

Affiliations
Review

Transgene-free genome editing and RNAi ectopic application in fruit trees: Potential and limitations

Satyanarayana Gouthu et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

For the past fifteen years, significant research advances in sequencing technology have led to a substantial increase in fruit tree genomic resources and databases with a massive number of OMICS datasets (transcriptomic, proteomics, metabolomics), helping to find associations between gene(s) and performance traits. Meanwhile, new technology tools have emerged for gain- and loss-of-function studies, specifically in gene silencing and developing tractable plant models for genetic transformation. Additionally, innovative and adapted transformation protocols have optimized genetic engineering in most fruit trees. The recent explosion of new gene-editing tools allows for broadening opportunities for functional studies in fruit trees. Yet, the fruit tree research community has not fully embraced these new technologies to provide large-scale genome characterizations as in cereals and other staple food crops. Instead, recent research efforts in the fruit trees appear to focus on two primary translational tools: transgene-free gene editing via Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) delivery and the ectopic application of RNA-based products in the field for crop protection. The inherent nature of the propagation system and the long juvenile phase of most fruit trees are significant justifications for the first technology. The second approach might have the public favor regarding sustainability and an eco-friendlier environment for a crop production system that could potentially replace the use of chemicals. Regardless of their potential, both technologies still depend on the foundational knowledge of gene-to-trait relationships generated from basic genetic studies. Therefore, we will discuss the status of gene silencing and DNA-based gene editing techniques for functional studies in fruit trees followed by the potential and limitations of their translational tools (RNP delivery and RNA-based products) in the context of crop production.

Keywords: RNA-based ectopic application; RNP delivery; fruit trees; gene silencing and editing; genetic tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of recently developed and validated genetic tools in plants for RNAi-silencing and DNA-based gene editing based on figures from previously published figures: (1) (Carbonell, 2019), (2) (Cisneros and Carbonell, 2020), (3) (Lowder et al., 2016), (4) (Zhong et al., 2020), (5) (Hassan et al., 2020).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Significant milestones achieved for RNA-based ectopic application. [1, 2]: Wang et al., 2014; Schwartz et al., 2020, [3-5]: Mitter et al., 2017, Zhang et al., 2019a, Demirer et al., 2020, [6-8]: Ahmed et al., 2020, Bennett et al., 2020, Sciabola et al., 2021, [9]: Delgado-Martín et al., 2022.

References

    1. Ahmed F., Senthil-Kumar M., Dai X., Ramu V. S., Lee S., Mysore K. S., et al. . (2020). pssRNAit: A web server for designing effective and specific plant siRNAs with genome-wide off-target assessment. Plant Physiol. 184, 65–81. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00293 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ai Y., Liang D., Wilusz J. E. (2022). CRISPR/Cas13 effectors have differing extents of off-target effects that limit their utility in eukaryotic cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 50 (11). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac159 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alghuthaymi M. A., Ahmad A., Khan Z., Khan S. H., Ahmed F. K., Faiz S., et al. . (2021). Exosome/Liposome-like nanoparticles: New carriers for CRISPR genome editing in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 7456. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147456 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali Z., Shami A., Sedeek K., Kamel R., Alhabsi A., Tehseen M., et al. . (2020). Fusion of the Cas9 endonuclease and the VirD2 relaxase facilitates homology-directed repair for precise genome engineering in rice. Commun. Biol. 3, 44. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0768-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aman R., Mahas A., Butt H., Ali Z., Aljedaani F., Mahfouz M. (2018). Engineering RNA virus interference via the CRISPR/Cas13 machinery in arabidopsis. Viruses 10, 732. doi: 10.3390/v10120732 - DOI - PMC - PubMed