Centralization of Pediatric Critical Care Services-It Seems to Work in Australia and New Zealand. Is It Right for All?
- PMID: 36326462
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003083
Centralization of Pediatric Critical Care Services-It Seems to Work in Australia and New Zealand. Is It Right for All?
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Argent has disclosed that he does not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Association Between Centralization and Outcome for Children Admitted to Intensive Care in Australia and New Zealand: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Nov 1;23(11):919-928. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003060. Epub 2022 Aug 29. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 36040098
References
-
- Shann F, Pearson G, Slater A, et al.: Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): A mortality prediction model for children in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 1997; 23:201–207
-
- Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR: Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med. 1988; 16:1110–1116
-
- George C, Norton L, Higlett T: Australian and New Zealand IC databases. ICU Management & Practice. 2006; 6:42
-
- Pearson G, Shann F, Barry P, et al.: Should paediatric intensive care be centralised? Trent versus Victoria. Lancet. 1997; 349:1213–1217
-
- Pearson G, Barry P, Timmins C, et al.: Changes in the profile of paediatric intensive care associated with centralisation. Intensive Care Med. 2001; 27:1670–1673
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical