Outcomes of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Viral Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- PMID: 36326705
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001671
Outcomes of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Viral Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Abstract
Our study assessed the relationship between the duration of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and patient outcomes. We studied patients undergoing V-V ECMO support for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) between 2009 and 2017 who were reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. We evaluated survival, major bleeding, renal failure, pulmonary complications, mechanical complications, neurologic complications, infection, and duration of V-V ECMO support. Multivariable regression modeling assessed risk factors for adverse events. Of the 4,636 patients studied, the mean support duration was 12.2 ± 13.7 days. There was a progressive increase in survival after the initiation of V-VECMO, peaking at a survival rate of 73% at 10 days of support. However, a single-day increase in V-V ECMO duration was associated with increased bleeding events (odds ratio [OR] 1.038; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.029-1.047; p < 0.0001), renal failure (OR 1.018; 95% CI: 1.010-1.027; p < 0.0001), mechanical complications (OR 1.065; 95% CI: 1.053-1.076; p < 0.0001), pulmonary complications (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03-1.05; p < 0.0001), and infection (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03-1.05; p < 0.0001). V-V ECMO progressively increases survival for ARDS over the first 10 days of support. Thereafter, rising complications associated with prolonged durations of support result in a progressive decline in survival.
Copyright © ASAIO 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
-
- Thiagarajan RR, Barbaro RP, Rycus PT, et al: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry International Report 2016. ASAIO J. 63: 60–67, 2017.
-
- Karagiannidis C, Brodie D, Strassmann S, et al.: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Evolving epidemiology and mortality. Intensive Care Med. 42: 889–896, 2016.
-
- Noah MA, Peek GJ, Finney SJ, et al.: Referral to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center and mortality among patients with severe 2009 influenza A(H1N1) JAMA. 306: 1659, 2011.
-
- Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al.: Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): A multicentre randomised controlled trial Lancet. 374: 1351–1363, 2009.
-
- Barbaro RP, MacLaren G, Boonstra PS, et al.: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: An international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry Lancet. 396: 1071–1078, 2020.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
