Scat as a source of DNA for population monitoring
- PMID: 36329814
- PMCID: PMC9618667
- DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9415
Scat as a source of DNA for population monitoring
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum.Ecol Evol. 2023 Jan 16;13(1):e9629. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9629. eCollection 2023 Jan. Ecol Evol. 2023. PMID: 36694556 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Sampling fecal droppings (scat) to genetically identify individual animals is an established method for monitoring mammal populations and could be highly useful for monitoring reptile populations. Whereas existing protocols for obtaining DNA from reptile scat focus on analyses of whole, fresh scat deposited during animal handling, the collection of scat naturally deposited by reptiles in situ, as required for non-invasive population monitoring, requires protocols to extract highly degraded DNA. Using surface swabs from such scats can reduce PCR inhibition and increase genotyping success. We report on three related but independently designed studies of DNA analyses from scat swabs of herbivorous reptiles under natural desert conditions: two free-ranging desert tortoise species (Agassiz's desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii, California, US, and Morafka's desert tortoise, G. morafkai, Arizona, US) and the common chuckwalla (Sauromalus atar) (Arizona, US, and Sonora, MX). We analyzed samples from both tortoise species with the same set of 16 microsatellites and chuckwalla samples with four mtDNA markers; studies also varied in swab preservation medium and DNA extraction method. Microsatellite amplification success per sample, defined as ≥9 loci with amplification, was 15% for the study of Agassiz's desert tortoise and for the study of 42% Morafka's desert tortoise. For chuckwallas, we successfully amplified and sequenced 50% of samples. We recovered fragments up to 400 bp for tortoises and 980 bp for chuckwallas from scat swab samples. This study indicates that genotypes can successfully be obtained from swabs of scat from herbivorous reptiles collected in the field under natural environmental conditions and emphasizes that repeat amplifications are necessary for the genetic identification of individuals from non-invasive samples.
Keywords: fecal DNA; microsatellites; mitochondrial DNA; non‐invasive sampling; reptile; scat.
© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Berger‐Tal, O. , & Lahoz‐Monfort, J. J. (2018). Conservation technology: The next generation. Conservation Letters, 11, e12458.
-
- Broquet, T. , Menard, N. , & Petit, E. (2007). Noninvasive population genetics: A review of sample source, diet, fragment length and microsatellite motif effects on amplification success and genotyping error rates. Conservation Genetics, 8, 249–260.
-
- Bull, C. M. , Griffith, S. C. , & Perkins, M. V. (1999). Some properties of a pheromone allowing individual recognition, from the scats of an Australian lizard, Egernia striolata . Acta Ethologica, 2, 35–42.
-
- Corl, A. , Davis, A. R. , Kuchta, S. R. , Comendant, T. , & Sinervo, B. (2010). Alternative mating strategies and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the side‐blotched lizard, uta stansburiana: A population‐level comparative analysis. Evolution, 64(1), 79–96. - PubMed
-
- Edwards, T. , & Berry, K. H. (2013). Are captive tortoises a reservoir for conservation? An assessment of genealogical affiliation of captive Gopherus agassizii to local, wild populations. Conservation Genetics, 14, 649–659.
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
