Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 8;15(10):1639-1652.
doi: 10.1111/eva.13360. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Effective specialist or jack of all trades? Experimental evolution of a crop pest in fluctuating and stable environments

Affiliations

Effective specialist or jack of all trades? Experimental evolution of a crop pest in fluctuating and stable environments

Anna Skoracka et al. Evol Appl. .

Abstract

Understanding pest evolution in agricultural systems is crucial for developing effective and innovative pest control strategies. Types of cultivation, such as crop monocultures versus polycultures or crop rotation, may act as a selective pressure on pests' capability to exploit the host's resources. In this study, we examined the herbivorous mite Aceria tosichella (commonly known as wheat curl mite), a widespread wheat pest, to understand how fluctuating versus stable environments influence its niche breadth and ability to utilize different host plant species. We subjected a wheat-bred mite population to replicated experimental evolution in a single-host environment (either wheat or barley), or in an alternation between these two plant species every three mite generations. Next, we tested the fitness of these evolving populations on wheat, barley, and on two other plant species not encountered during experimental evolution, namely rye and smooth brome. Our results revealed that the niche breadth of A. tosichella evolved in response to the level of environmental variability. The fluctuating environment expanded the niche breadth by increasing the mite's ability to utilize different plant species, including novel ones. Such an environment may thus promote flexible host-use generalist phenotypes. However, the niche expansion resulted in some costs expressed as reduced performances on both wheat and barley as compared to specialists. Stable host environments led to specialized phenotypes. The population that evolved in a constant environment consisting of barley increased its fitness on barley without the cost of utilizing wheat. However, the population evolving on wheat did not significantly increase its fitness on wheat, but decreased its performance on barley. Altogether, our results indicated that, depending on the degree of environmental heterogeneity, agricultural systems create different conditions that influence pests' niche breadth evolution, which may in turn affect the ability of pests to persist in such systems.

Keywords: Aceria tosichella; environmental variability; experimental evolution; host range; niche breadth; wheat curl mite.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Fitness of Aceria tosichella experimental populations evolving in a fluctuating environment (aTH‐lines): alternating wheat (Triticum) and barley (Hordeum), and in a constant environment: on either barley (cH‐lines) or wheat (cT‐lines), measured as population growth rate on wheat (a), barley (b), and brome (Bromus) (c) at generation 45 in relation to the fitness of the stock colony (generation 0) maintained on wheat
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Fitness of Aceria tosichella experimental populations evolving in a fluctuating environment (aTH‐lines): alternating wheat (Triticum) and barley (Hordeum), and in a constant environment: on either barley (cH‐lines) or wheat (cT‐lines), measured as population growth rate on wheat (a), barley (b), and rye (Secale) (c) at generation 60
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Contrasts reflecting specific predictions after 45 (a) and 60 (b) generations of Aceria tosichella evolution. Points represent means, and bars are 95% confidence intervals

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agosta, S. J. , & Klemens, J. A. (2009). Resource specialization in a phytophagous insect: no evidence for genetically based performance trade‐offs across hosts in the field or laboratory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 907–912. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01694.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali, J. G. , & Agrawal, A. A. (2012). Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends in Plant Science, 17(5), 293–302. 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altieri, M. A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 74(1–3), 19–31. 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6 - DOI
    1. Andow, D. A. (1991). Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annual Review of Entomology, 36(1), 561–586. 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.003021 - DOI
    1. Barrett, L. G. , & Heil, M. (2012). Unifying concepts and mechanisms in the specificity of plant‐enemy interactions. Trends in Plant Science, 17(5), 282–292. 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.009 - DOI - PubMed