Smoke analysis of a new surgical system that applies low-temperature plasma
- PMID: 36330412
- PMCID: PMC9622500
- DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-608
Smoke analysis of a new surgical system that applies low-temperature plasma
Abstract
Background: The high-frequency electrotome (ES), which is widely used in surgical procedures, generates surgical smoke that is potentially hazardous to operating personnel. Previous research shows that the PlasmaBlade (PB) may be able to overcome this problem. The present study set out to analyze potentially hazardous surgical smoke generated during electrosurgery by the ES, the PB, and. a new surgical system that applies low-temperature plasma, the NTS-100.
Methods: In vitro and in vivo healthy porcine models were used to compare volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM) in smoke generated by the NTS-100, the PB, and the conventional ES when cutting liver, muscle, and skin and subcutaneous tissues. The detected indexes included the VOCs in surgical smoke, the concentration and percentage of each part, the PM2.5 concentration, the mass of particles, and the diameter distribution of particles.
Results: The smoke generated by the NTS-100 contained fewer hazardous components than that generated by the ES (P<0.05) and a comparable amount to that generated by the PB (P>0.05). The PM2.5 concentration and mass of particles in the smoke generated by the NTS-100 were lower than those with the ES (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively) and similar to those with the PB (P>0.05). The NTS-100 generated larger particles than did the ES and the PB (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Surgical smoke contains harmful VOCs and PM, but the NTS-100 generated less hazardous surgical smoke than did the conventional ES and performed comparably to the PB. Therefore, using the NTS-100 may reduce the potential hazard of surgical smoke to operating room personnel.
Keywords: High-frequency electrotome; PlasmaBlade (PB); low-temperature plasma; surgical smoke.
2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-608/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures





Comment in
-
Do we need to reduce surgical smoke?Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(24):1304. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5652. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36660628 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Surgical smoke and occupational health.Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(24):1303. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5631. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36660725 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparative healing of swine skin following incisions with different surgical devices.Ann Transl Med. 2021 Oct;9(20):1514. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3090. Ann Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 34790720 Free PMC article.
-
The characterization of surgical smoke from various tissues and its implications for occupational safety.PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195274. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29649244 Free PMC article.
-
Characterisation of Exposure to Ultrafine Particles from Surgical Smoke by Use of a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer.Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Aug;60(7):860-74. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew033. Epub 2016 Jun 2. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016. PMID: 27255204
-
Surgical Smoke Exposure in Operating Room Personnel: A Review.JAMA Surg. 2019 Oct 1;154(10):960-967. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2515. JAMA Surg. 2019. PMID: 31433468 Review.
-
The Dangers of Electrosurgical Smoke to Operating Room Personnel: A Review.Workplace Health Saf. 2017 Nov;65(11):517-526. doi: 10.1177/2165079917691063. Epub 2017 Apr 17. Workplace Health Saf. 2017. PMID: 28414627 Review.
Cited by
-
Do we need to reduce surgical smoke?Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(24):1304. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5652. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36660628 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Surgical smoke and occupational health.Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(24):1303. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5631. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36660725 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Peprah K, Spry C. Pulsed Electron Avalanche Knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade versus Traditional Electrocautery for Surgery: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; August 9, 2019. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources