Convergence in Perceptions of Ecosystem Services Supports Green Infrastructure Decision-making in a Semi-arid City
- PMID: 36333485
- DOI: 10.1007/s00267-022-01738-0
Convergence in Perceptions of Ecosystem Services Supports Green Infrastructure Decision-making in a Semi-arid City
Abstract
Effective management of cities using ecosystem services from green infrastructure (GI) requires explicit consideration of the linkages between provision of services and ecosystem service demands (i.e., governance priorities). Identification of stakeholder knowledge and objectives in GI decision-making contexts with respect to ecosystem services may improve urban planning; yet this information is rarely explicit in local contexts and cases. We address this gap by surveying environmental stakeholders and practitioners to investigate how perceptions of ecosystem services influence GI practice in Tucson, AZ. Results indicate that the semi-arid environment and urban design led to prioritizations that focus on water sustainability and urban heat mitigation. We found strong agreement in environmental perceptions between different management sectors. We observed matches (as well as mismatches) between the ecosystem service priorities and important environmental issues. Ecosystem services prioritization revealed a unique classification of ecosystem services that reflects stakeholder priorities. Our findings suggest the study of ecosystem services supply and demand can inform local urban management. These findings from a semi-arid city further suggest that understanding stakeholder knowledge, perceptions, and priorities should be important for cities in other regions where GI is being implemented as an environmental solution to provide ecosystem services.
Keywords: Environmental management; Green infrastructure; Semi-arid cities; Stormwater; Urban ecosystem services.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Mapping supply of and demand for ecosystem services to assess environmental justice in New York City.Ecol Appl. 2021 Sep;31(6):e02390. doi: 10.1002/eap.2390. Epub 2021 Jul 26. Ecol Appl. 2021. PMID: 34142407 Free PMC article.
-
A spatial framework for targeting urban planning for pollinators and people with local stakeholders: A route to healthy, blossoming communities?Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:255-268. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 26. Environ Res. 2017. PMID: 28662451
-
Urban green infrastructure: A review on valuation toolkits from an urban planning perspective.J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 1;267:110603. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110603. Epub 2020 Apr 27. J Environ Manage. 2020. PMID: 32349950 Review.
-
Identifying linkages between urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services using an expert opinion methodology.Ambio. 2020 Feb;49(2):569-583. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01223-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31. Ambio. 2020. PMID: 31473977 Free PMC article.
-
Urban ecosystem services for resilience planning and management in New York City.Ambio. 2014 May;43(4):502-15. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0509-8. Ambio. 2014. PMID: 24740621 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rethinking trade-offs in nature-based solutions from a multispecies justice perspective.NPJ Urban Sustain. 2025;5(1):67. doi: 10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5. Epub 2025 Aug 18. NPJ Urban Sustain. 2025. PMID: 40838044 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ahern J (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc Urban Plan 100(4):341–43 - DOI
-
- Baptiste AK (2014) ‘Experience Is a Great Teacher’: Citizens’ Reception of a Proposal for the Implementation of Green Infrastructure as Stormwater Management Technology. Community Dev 45(4):337–52 - DOI
-
- Baptiste AK, Foley C, Smardon R (2015) Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: a case study of Syracuse, NY. Landsc Urban Plan 136:1–12 - DOI
-
- Baró F, Gómez-Baggethun E, Haase D (2017) Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: insights for landscape planning and management. Ecosyst Serv 24:147–59 - DOI
-
- Baró F, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E, Frantzeskaki N (2015) Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: a quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecol Indic 55:146–58 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous