Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Dec;118(6):1172-1182.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.860. Epub 2022 Nov 3.

Impact of cystectomy versus ablation for endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Impact of cystectomy versus ablation for endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ying Zhang et al. Fertil Steril. 2022 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether cystectomy or ablation for endometrioma has less impact on ovarian reserve as evaluated by antral follicle count (AFC) and antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patient(s): Patients with endometriomas undergoing cystectomy or ablation.

Intervention(s): All prospective studies comparing cystectomy with ablation for endometrioma in the PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science until April 3, 2022 were retrieved and reviewed. Medical treatment used as adjuvant therapy for the surgery was excluded. Two authors assessed eligibility and risk of bias independently. The statistical data were pooled using the Review Manager software.

Main outcome measure(s): The changes of AMH levels and AFC values in cystectomy group and ablation group, including intergroup comparisons and intragroup comparisons.

Result(s): Four randomized clinical trials and 2 prospective cohort studies were eligible for the meta-analysis, with a total of 294 patients. In the intergroup comparisons, preoperative AFC values were similar with low heterogeneity, but postoperative AFC values were significantly lower in cystectomy than ablation (mean differences [MD], -1.33; 95% credible interval, -2.15 to -0.51; I2 = 57%). In the intragroup comparisons of AFC values, sensitivity analyses showed a significant decrease in cystectomy (MD, -1.93; 95% credible interval, -2.40 to -1.45; I2 = 0%) at 6-month follow-up, compared with no reduction in ablation. The intragroup comparisons of AMH levels supported negative effects on ovarian reserve of both cystectomy (MD, -1.26; 95% credible interval, -1.64 to -0.88; I2 = 45%) and ablation (MD, -0.70; 95% credible interval, -1.07 to -0.32; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion(s): Both ablation and cystectomy have significantly detrimental effects on ovarian reserve as evaluated by AMH, but the ablation causes relatively less damage to ovarian reserve as appraised by AFC.

Clinical trial registration number: CRD42020152823;PROSPERO (york.ac.uk).

Keywords: ablation; antimüllerian hormone; antral follicle count; cystectomy; endometrioma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances

LinkOut - more resources