Helicobacter pylori eradication for primary prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding in older patients prescribed aspirin in primary care (HEAT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- PMID: 36335970
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01843-8
Helicobacter pylori eradication for primary prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding in older patients prescribed aspirin in primary care (HEAT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Peptic ulcers in patients receiving aspirin are associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. We aimed to investigate whether H pylori eradication would protect against aspirin-associated ulcer bleeding.
Methods: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Helicobacter Eradication Aspirin Trial [HEAT]) at 1208 primary care centres in the UK, using routinely collected clinical data. Eligible patients were aged 60 years or older who were receiving aspirin at a daily dose of 325 mg or less (with four or more 28-day prescriptions in the past year) and had a positive C13 urea breath test for H pylori at screening. Patients receiving ulcerogenic or gastroprotective medication were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either a combination of oral clarithromycin 500 mg, metronidazole 400 mg, and lansoprazole 30 mg (active eradication), or oral placebo (control), twice daily for 1 week. Participants, their general practitioners and health-care providers, and the research nurses, trial team, adjudication committee, and analysis team were all masked to group allocation throughout the trial. Follow-up was by scrutiny of electronic data in primary and secondary care. The primary outcome was time to hospitalisation or death due to definite or probable peptic ulcer bleeding, and was analysed by Cox proportional hazards methods in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2011-003425-96.
Findings: Between Sept 14, 2012, and Nov 22, 2017, 30 166 patients had breath testing for H pylori, 5367 had a positive result, and 5352 were randomly assigned to receive active eradication (n=2677) or placebo (n=2675) and were followed up for a median of 5·0 years (IQR 3·9-6·4). Analysis of the primary outcome showed a significant departure from proportional hazards assumptions (p=0·0068), requiring analysis over separate time periods. There was a significant reduction in incidence of the primary outcome in the active eradication group in the first 2·5 years of follow-up compared with the control group (six episodes adjudicated as definite or probable peptic ulcer bleeds, rate 0·92 [95% CI 0·41-2·04] per 1000 person-years vs 17 episodes, rate 2·61 [1·62-4·19] per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0·35 [95% CI 0·14-0·89]; p=0·028). This advantage remained significant after adjusting for the competing risk of death (p=0·028) but was lost with longer follow-up (HR 1·31 [95% CI 0·55-3·11] in the period after the first 2·5 years; p=0·54). Reports of adverse events were actively solicited; taste disturbance was the most common event (787 patients).
Interpretation: H pylori eradication protects against aspirin-associated peptic ulcer bleeding, but this might not be sustained in the long term.
Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests CH reports research funding from the Cancer Research UK AsCaP Catalyst Collaboration (A24991), and consulting fees from Kallyope. CH and JD report research funding from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme for the ALL-HEART (11/36/41) and ATTACK (16/31/127) studies. FDRH reports part-funding from the NIHR School for Primary Care Research, the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Health Research and Care (CLARHC) Oxford, the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), and the NIHR Oxford Medtech and In-Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative. GR chairs and has received funding from the CanTest Collaborative, a Cancer Research UK Catalyst programme of research (C8640/A23385). AA is National Clinical Director for Prescribing (National Health Service England). All other authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Aspirin and Helicobacter pylori interaction.Lancet. 2022 Nov 5;400(10363):1560-1561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02000-1. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 36335960 No abstract available.
-
Impact of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Incidence of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding in Patients Taking Regular Aspirin.Gastroenterology. 2023 May;164(6):1017. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.11.047. Epub 2022 Dec 9. Gastroenterology. 2023. PMID: 36502864 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Helicobacter pylori eradication as a gastroprotective strategy in elderly aspirin-treated subjects: established facts and unanswered questions.Eur Heart J. 2023 Mar 1;44(9):711-712. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac808. Eur Heart J. 2023. PMID: 36638779 No abstract available.
-
In older patients receiving aspirin, H pylori eradication reduced hospitalization or death due to peptic ulcer bleeding at 2.5 y.Ann Intern Med. 2023 Apr;176(4):JC45. doi: 10.7326/J23-0011. Epub 2023 Apr 4. Ann Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37011389
-
Helicobacter pylori eradication and aspirin: a puzzle yet to be solved.Lancet. 2023 Apr 15;401(10384):1265-1266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00279-9. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 37061264 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous