A synthesis of deimatic behaviour
- PMID: 36336882
- DOI: 10.1111/brv.12891
A synthesis of deimatic behaviour
Abstract
Deimatic behaviours, also referred to as startle behaviours, are used against predators and rivals. Although many are spectacular, their proximate and ultimate causes remain unclear. In this review we aim to synthesise what is known about deimatic behaviour and identify knowledge gaps. We propose a working hypothesis for deimatic behaviour, and discuss the available evidence for the evolution, ontogeny, causation, and survival value of deimatic behaviour using Tinbergen's Four Questions as a framework. Our overarching aim is to direct future research by suggesting ways to address the most pressing questions in this field.
Keywords: antipredator; aposematism; behaviour; cognition; competition; defence; deimatism; predator; prey; startle.
© 2022 Cambridge Philosophical Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abbott, K. R. & Sherratt, T. N. (2011). The evolution of superstition through optimal use of incomplete information. Animal Behaviour 82, 85-92.
-
- Abrams, P. A. (2000). The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31, 79-105.
-
- *Adamo, S. A., Ehgoetz, K., Sangster, C. & Whitehorne, I. (2006). Signaling to the enemy? Body pattern expression and its response to external cues during hunting in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (Cephalopoda). The Biological Bulletin 210, 192-200.
-
- Aguilar-Argüello, S., Díaz-Fleischer, F. & Rao, D. (2016). Motion-triggered defensive display in a tephritid fly. Journal of Ethology 34, 31-37.
-
- Åsli, O. & Flaten, M. A. (2012). In the blink of an eye: investigating the role of awareness in fear responding by measuring the latency of startle potentiation. Brain Sciences 2, 61-84.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources