Disparities in Lung-Protective Ventilation in the United States
- PMID: 36337793
- PMCID: PMC9625078
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29834
Disparities in Lung-Protective Ventilation in the United States
Abstract
Background The objective of our study was to determine whether disparities exist in the use of lung-protective ventilation for critically ill mechanically ventilated patients in the United States based on gender, race/ethnicity, or insurance status. Methods This was a secondary data analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study conducted from 2010 to 2012. The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients receiving tidal volume > 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW). Results There were 1,595 patients in our primary analysis (710 women, 885 men). Women were more likely to receive tidal volumes > 8 mL/kg PBW than men (odds ratio [OR] = 3.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.67-4.40), a finding largely but not completely explained by gender differences in height. The underinsured were significantly more likely to receive tidal volume > 8 mL/kg PBW than the insured in multivariable analysis (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.16-2.04). The prescription of > 8 mL/kg PBW tidal volume did not differ by racial or ethnic categories. Conclusions In this prospective nationwide cohort of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, women and the underinsured were less likely than their comparators to receive lung-protective ventilation, with no apparent differences based on race/ethnicity alone.
Keywords: critical care; insurance coverage; lung injury; mechanical ventilation; respiratory failure; sex; tidal volume.
Copyright © 2022, Malnoske et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care. Fowler RA, Sabur N, Li P, et al. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.071112. CMAJ. 2007;177:1513–1519. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources