Residual Inflammatory Risk After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Underappreciated But Modifiable
- PMID: 36338394
- PMCID: PMC9627932
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.003
Residual Inflammatory Risk After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Underappreciated But Modifiable
Keywords: c-reactive protein; cardiovascular risk; percutaneous coronary intervention; residual inflammatory risk.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment on
- doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.014
References
-
- Kufner S., Joner M., Thannheimer A., et al. Ten-year clinical outcomes from a trial of three limus-eluting stents with different polymer coatings in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2019;139:325–333. - PubMed
-
- Cutlip D.E., Chhabra A.G., Baim D.S., et al. Beyond restenosis: five-year clinical outcomes from second-generation coronary stent trials. Circulation. 2004;110:1226–1230. - PubMed
-
- Naghavi M., Libby P., Falk E., et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664–1672. - PubMed
-
- Libby P., Ridker P.M., Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105:1135–1143. - PubMed
-
- Visseren F.L.J., Mach F., Smulders Y.M., et al. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: developed by the Task Force for cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3227–3337. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials