Japanese multicenter prospective study investigating laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer with evaluation of CRM and TME quality (PRODUCT trial)
- PMID: 36338586
- PMCID: PMC9628237
- DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12592
Japanese multicenter prospective study investigating laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer with evaluation of CRM and TME quality (PRODUCT trial)
Abstract
Aim: In Japan, we have not been able to validate the results of laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer using the universal index "circumferential resection margin (CRM)." Previously, we established a semi-opened circular specimen processing method and validated its feasibility. In the PRODUCT trial, we aimed to assess CRM in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic rectal resection.
Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma located at or below 12 cm above the anal verge with clinical stage II or III and were scheduled for laparoscopic or robotic surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological CRM. CRM ≤1 mm was defined as positive.
Results: A total of 303 patients operated on between August 2018 and January 2020 were included in the primary analysis. The number of patients with clinical stage II and III was 139 and 164, respectively. Upfront surgery was performed for 213 patients and neoadjuvant therapy for 90 patients. The median CRM was 4.0 mm (IQR, 2.1-8.0 mm), and CRM was positive in 26 cases (8.6%). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that a predicted CRM from the mesorectal fascia of ≤1 mm on MRI was the significant factor for positive CRM (P = .0012 and P = .0045, respectively).
Conclusion: This study showed the quality of laparoscopic rectal resection based on the CRM in Japan. Preoperative MRI is recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer to prevent CRM positivity.
Keywords: laparoscopy; magnetic resonance imaging; margins of excision; rectal neoplasms; total mesorectal excision.
© 2022 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.
Figures
References
-
- Glynne‐Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rödel C, Cervantes A, et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up†. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:iv22–40. - PubMed
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network . Rectal cancer (Version 2.2021). 2021.
-
- Swedish Rectal Cancer T, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, et al. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:980–7. - PubMed
-
- Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George VV, Abbas MA, et al. Disease‐free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III Rectal Cancer: follow‐up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269:589–95. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
