Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Present Status and Future Perspectives
- PMID: 36339118
- PMCID: PMC9627854
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.011
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Present Status and Future Perspectives
Abstract
For several decades, coronary artery bypass grafting has been regarded as the standard choice of revascularization for significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. However, in conjunction with remarkable advancement of device technology and adjunctive pharmacology, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers a more expeditious approach with rapid recovery and is a safe and effective alternative in appropriately selected patients with LMCA disease. Several landmark randomized clinical trials showed that PCI with drug-eluting stents for LMCA disease is a safe option with similar long-term survival rates to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, especially in those with low and intermediate anatomic risk. Although it is expected that the updated evidence from recent randomized clinical trials will determine the next guidelines for the foreseeable future, there are still unresolved and unmet issues of LMCA revascularization and PCI strategy. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the evolution and an update on the management of LMCA disease.
Keywords: BMS, bare-metal stent(s); CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD, coronary artery disease; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; DES, drug-eluting stent(s); DK, double-kissing; FFR, fractional flow reserve; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCX, left circumflex artery; LMCA, left main coronary artery; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACCE, major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; MLA, minimal lumen area; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RCT, randomized clinical trial; coronary artery bypass grafting; iFR, instantaneous wave-free ratio; left main coronary artery disease; percutaneous coronary intervention.
© 2022 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Lee P.H., Ahn J.M., Chang M., et al. Left main coronary artery disease: secular trends in patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1233–1246. - PubMed
-
- D’Ascenzo F., Presutti D.G., Picardi E., et al. Prevalence and non-invasive predictors of left main or three-vessel coronary disease: evidence from a collaborative international meta-analysis including 22 740 patients. Heart. 2012;98:914–919. - PubMed
-
- Levine G.N., Bates E.R., Blankenship J.C., et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2550–2583. - PubMed
-
- Tan W.A., Tamai H., Park S.J., et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after unprotected left main trunk percutaneous revascularization in 279 patients. Circulation. 2001;104:1609–1614. - PubMed
-
- Park D.W., Park S.J. Percutaneous coronary intervention of left main disease: pre- and post-EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) and NOBLE (Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularization Study) era. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(6) - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
