Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 20:20:90.
doi: 10.18332/tid/154075. eCollection 2022.

Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Jing Li  1   2 , Xu Hui  1   2 , Jiani Fu  3 , Muhammad Muneeb Ahmed  4 , Liang Yao  5 , Kehu Yang  1   2   6
Affiliations
Review

Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Jing Li et al. Tob Induc Dis. .

Abstract

Introduction: Nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been frequently used for smoking cessation. The aim of this review is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library from inception to 10 October 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for eligibility. Paired authors extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and used GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to rate the certainty of evidence.

Results: The study included five RCTs with 1748 participants. The meta-analysis suggested the e-cigarettes versus NRT increased the ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.67; 95% CI: 1.21-2.28; 55 more per 1000 participants, low certainty), and 7-day point abstinence rate at ≥6 months follow-up (RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.19-1.72; 84 more per 1000, low certainty). However, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes versus NRT increased 3-6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.07; 95% CI: 0.73-1.57; 10 more per 1000, very low certainty) and <3 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.20; 95% CI: 0.90-1.60; 54 more per 1000, low certainty); similar results were found at <3 months follow-up (RR=1.19; 95% CI: 0.92-1.54; 55 more per 1000, very low certainty) and 3-6 months follow-up in 7-day point abstinence rate (RR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.70-1.44; 2 more per 1000, very low certainty). The adverse events were not significant between e-cigarettes and NRT other than throat irritation (RR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.13-1.42; 118 more per 1000, low certainty).

Conclusions: E-cigarettes appeared to be superior to NRT in ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate. At short-term duration, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes compared to NRT increased the <6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate.

Keywords: 7-day point abstinence rate; continuous abstinence rate; electronic cigarettes; nicotine-replacement therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. All the authors report that since the initial planning of the work that this study was supported by the Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of China: Research on the Theoretical System, International Experience, and Chinese Path of Evidence-based Social Science (No. 19ZDA14).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification of relevant randomized controlled trials
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of risk of bias for each trial
Figure 3
Figure 3
Subgroup analyses by follow-up duration in continuous abstinence rate in participants receiving e-cigarettes versus NRT
Figure 4
Figure 4
Subgroup analyses by follow-up duration in 7-day point abstinence rate in participants receiving e-cigarettes versus NRT
Figure 5
Figure 5
Adverse events in participants who received e-cigarettes versus NRT
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Health Organization Tobacco. Accessed March 9, 2022. https://www.who.int/health-topics/tobacco#tab=tab_2.
    1. Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V, et al. 21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(4):341–350. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1211128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toll BA, Rojewski AM, Duncan LR, et al. “Quitting smoking will benefit your health”: the evolution of clinician messaging to encourage tobacco cessation. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(2):301–309. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2261. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung B. E-cigarette Use and Smoking Cessation Among South Korean Adult Smokers: A Propensity Score-Matching Approach. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2018;30(4):332–341. doi: 10.1177/1010539517740054. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown R, Bauld L, de Lacy E, et al. A qualitative study of e-cigarette emergence and the potential for renormalisation of smoking in UK youth. Int J Drug Policy. 2020;75:102598. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.11.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources