Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 19:3:969337.
doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.969337. eCollection 2022.

Induction of food-specific IgG by Gene Gun-delivered DNA vaccines

Affiliations

Induction of food-specific IgG by Gene Gun-delivered DNA vaccines

Johanna M Smeekens et al. Front Allergy. .

Abstract

Background: Shellfish and tree nut allergies are among the most prevalent food allergies, now affecting 2%-3% and 1% of the US population, respectively. Currently, there are no approved therapies for shellfish or tree nut allergies, with strict avoidance being the standard of care. However, oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy and subcutaneous immunotherapy for environmental allergens are efficacious and lead to the production of allergen-specific IgG, which causes suppression of allergen effector cell degranulation. Since allergen-specific IgG is a desired response to alleviate IgE-mediated allergies, we tested transcutaneously-delivered DNA vaccines targeting shellfish and tree nut allergens for their ability to induce antigen-specific IgG, which would have therapeutic potential for food allergies.

Methods: We assessed Gene Gun-delivered DNA vaccines targeting either crustacean shellfish or walnut/pecan allergens, with or without IL-12, in naïve mice. Three strains of mice, BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ and CC027/GeniUnc, were evaluated for IgG production following vaccination. Vaccines were administered twice via Gene Gun, three weeks apart and then blood was collected three weeks following the final vaccination.

Results: Vaccination with shellfish allergen DNA led to increased shrimp-specific IgG in all three strains, with the highest production in C3H/HeJ from the vaccine alone, whereas the vaccine with IL-12 led to the highest IgG production in BALB/cJ and CC027/GeniUnc mice. Similar IgG production was also induced against lobster and crab allergens. For walnut/pecan vaccines, BALB/cJ and C3H/HeJ mice produced significantly higher walnut- and pecan-specific IgG with the vaccine alone compared to the vaccine with IL-12, while the CC027 mice made significantly higher IgG with the addition of IL-12. Notably, intramuscular administration of the vaccines did not lead to increased antigen-specific IgG production, indicating that Gene Gun administration is a superior delivery modality.

Conclusions: Overall, these data demonstrate the utility of DNA vaccines against two lifelong food allergies, shellfish and tree nuts, suggesting their potential as a food allergy therapy in the future.

Keywords: BALB/cJ; C3H/HeJ; CC027; DNA vaccine; Gene Gun; IgG; food allergy; shrimp allergy; walnut allergy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Hannah Frizzell and Kenneth Bagley are employees of Orlance Inc. with stock options. Orlance Inc. is seeking to bring DNA vaccines, including those for food allergies, to market. All other authors declare that research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Vaccine formulation, delivery and schedule. DNA plasmid designs for (A) shellfish vaccine and (B) walnut/pecan vaccine. (C) Components of Gene Gun for transcutaneous vaccine administration. (D) Experimental scheme for vaccination.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Shrimp-specific immunoglobulin responses following DNA vaccination with Gene Gun. Shrimp-specific (A) IgG, (B) IgG1, and (C) IgG2a in naïve and vaccinated BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ and CC027 mice. (D) Western blot showing Gene Gun-vaccinated mice make shrimp-specific IgG against the major shellfish allergen tropomyosin (purple box). (E) Shrimp-specific IgE in naïve, vaccinated and sensitized BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, and CC027 mice. Statistical comparisons were made using unpaired t tests; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lobster- and crab-specific IgG responses following DNA vaccination with Gene Gun. (A) Lobster-specific IgG and (B) Crab-specific IgG in naïve and vaccinated BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ and CC027 mice. Correlations between (C) shrimp- and crab-specific IgG responses, (D) shrimp- and lobster-specific IgG responses, and (E) lobster- and crab-specific IgG responses in BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, and CC027 mice. Statistical comparisons were made using unpaired t tests; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Linear regression analyses were performed on the correlation plots.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Walnut-specific immunoglobulin responses following DNA vaccination with Gene Gun. Walnut-specific (A) IgG, (B) IgG1, and (C) IgG2a in naïve and vaccinated BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ and CC027 mice. (D) Western blot showing Gene Gun-vaccinated mice make walnut (W)- and pecan (P)-specific IgG against the major allergens (purple boxes): vicilin (Jug r 2 and Car i 2), legumin (Jug r 4 and Car i 4), and 2S albumin (Car i 1). (E) Walnut-specific IgE in naïve, vaccinated and sensitized BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, and CC027 mice. Statistical comparisons were made using unpaired t tests; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Pecan-specific IgG responses following DNA vaccination with Gene Gun. (A) Pecan-specific IgG quantities in naïve and vaccinated BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, and CC027 mice. (B) Correlation between walnut- and pecan-specific IgG responses. Statistical comparisons were made using unpaired t tests; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Linear regression analysis was performed on the correlation plot.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gupta RS, Warren CM, Smith BM, Jiang J, Blumenstock JA, Davis MM, et al. Prevalence and severity of food allergies among US adults. JAMA Netw Open. (2019) 2(1):e185630. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5630 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DunnGalvin A, Dubois AE, Flokstra-de Blok BM, Hourihane JO. The effects of food allergy on quality of life. Chem Immunol Allergy. (2015) 101:235–52. 10.1159/000375106 - DOI - PubMed
    1. DunnGalvin A, Koman E, Raver E, Frome H, Adams M, Keena A, et al. An examination of the food allergy quality of life questionnaire performance in a countrywide American sample of children: cross-cultural differences in age and impact in the United States and Europe. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. (2017) 5(2):363–8 e2. 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.09.049 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gupta R, Holdford D, Bilaver L, Dyer A, Holl JL, Meltzer D. The economic impact of childhood food allergy in the United States. JAMA Pediatr. (2013) 167(11):1026–31. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2376 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fleischer DM, Conover-Walker MK, Matsui EC, Wood RA. The natural history of tree nut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2005) 116(5):1087–93. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.002 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources