Near-infrared calibration models for estimating volatile fatty acids and methane production from in vitro rumen fermentation of different total mixed rations
- PMID: 36340672
- PMCID: PMC9623674
- DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2021-0156
Near-infrared calibration models for estimating volatile fatty acids and methane production from in vitro rumen fermentation of different total mixed rations
Abstract
Volatile fatty acids (VFA) and methane (CH4) are the major products of rumen fermentation. The VFA are considered an energy source for the animal and rumen microbiota, and CH4 (which is released by eructation) is considered an energy loss. Quantification of these fermentation products is fundamental for the evaluation of feeds and diets, and provides important information regarding the use of nutrients by ruminants. Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is increasingly used for the evaluation of animal feeds because it is rapid, nondestructive, noninvasive, and inexpensive; does not require reagents; and the results are reproducible. The aim of this study was to develop NIR calibration models for estimating the production of VFA (acetic, propionic, butyric, valeric, isovaleric, and isobutyric acids), total gas, and CH4 using in vitro gas production tests with buffered rumen inoculum throughout fermentation. Fifty-four total mixed rations (TMRs) were examined, and rumen fluid was manually collected from 2 dry Holstein dairy cows that had ruminal fistulas and were fed at maintenance energy levels. Then, 30 mL of buffered rumen fluid was incubated in bottles with ~220 mg of TMR. The total gas, VFA, and CH4 were measured after 2, 5, 9, 24, 30, 48, and 72 h of rumen incubation for each TMR. The VFA were measured on 32 randomly selected TMR. In particular, 7 bottles were used for each TMR, one for each incubation time. Methane was measured in the headspace and VFA were measured in the buffered rumen fluid. The bottles were considered experimental units for calibration purposes. The production of CH4 was quantified from the bottle headspaces by gas chromatography, and total gas production was measured using a pressure transducer at each incubation time. Two aliquots of the fermented liquids were sampled by opening the bottles at each incubation time, and (1) the concentrations of VFA were determined by gas chromatography or (2) spectra were obtained from Fourier-transform NIR spectroscopy. The data were randomly divided into calibration and validation data sets. The average concentrations of acetic acid (45.30 ± 11.92 and 43.86 ± 11.93 mmol/L), propionic acid (14.97 ± 6.08 and 14.38 ± 6.56 mmol/L), butyric acid (8.47 ± 3.47 and 8.65 ± 3.79 mmol/L), total gas (111.34 ± 81.90 and 116.46 ± 82.44 mL/g of organic matter), and CH4 (9.65 ± 9.45 and 10.35 ± 9.33 mmol/L) were similar in the 2 data sets. The best calibration models were retained based on the coefficient of determination (R2) and the ratio of prediction to deviation (RPD). The R2 values for prediction of VFA ranged from 0.69 (RPD = 3.28) for valeric acid to 0.94 (RPD = 4.20) for acetic acid. The models also provided good predictions of CH4 (R2 = 0.89, RPD = 3.05) and cumulative gas production (R2 = 0.91, RPD = 3.30). The models described here precisely and accurately estimated the production of CH4 and VFA during in vitro rumen fermentation tests. Validations at additional laboratories may provide more robust calibrations.
© 2021.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Changes in in vitro gas and methane production from rumen fluid from dairy cows during adaptation to feed additives in vivo.Animal. 2017 Apr;11(4):591-599. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116002019. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Animal. 2017. PMID: 27748233
-
Replacing soybean meal with microalgae biomass in diets with contrasting carbohydrate profiles can reduce in vitro methane production and improve short-chain fatty acid production.J Dairy Sci. 2024 Aug;107(8):5542-5555. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24025. Epub 2024 Feb 22. J Dairy Sci. 2024. PMID: 38395394
-
Technical note: Evaluation of sampling methods for methane concentration from in vitro fermentation.J Anim Sci. 2022 Sep 1;100(9):skac259. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac259. J Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 35953208 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of three methane mitigation agents on parameters of kinetics of total and hydrogen gas production, ruminal fermentation and hydrogen balance using in vitro technique.Anim Sci J. 2016 Feb;87(2):224-32. doi: 10.1111/asj.12423. Epub 2015 Jul 29. Anim Sci J. 2016. PMID: 26223853 Review.
-
Gas Endeavour: An Innovative Equipment for Estimating Methane Kinetics During In Vitro Rumen Fermentation.Animals (Basel). 2025 May 5;15(9):1331. doi: 10.3390/ani15091331. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40362146 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rumen Fermentation Parameters Prediction Model for Dairy Cows Using a Stacking Ensemble Learning Method.Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;13(4):678. doi: 10.3390/ani13040678. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36830465 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Fecal Indices as a Non-Invasive Tool for Ruminal Activity Evaluation in Extensive Grazing Sheep.Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 9;12(8):974. doi: 10.3390/ani12080974. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35454221 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alemu A.W., Dijkstra J., Bannink A., France J., Kebreab E. Rumen stoichiometric models and their contribution and challenges in predicting enteric methane production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011;166–167:761–778. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.054. - DOI
-
- Andrés S., Calleja A., López S., González J.S., Rodríguez P.L., Giráldez F.J. Prediction of gas production kinetic parameters of forages by chemical composition and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005;123–124:487–499. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.043. - DOI
-
- Aptula A.O., Jeliazkova N.G., Schultz T.W., Cronin M.T.D. The better predictive model: High q2 for the training set or low root mean square error of prediction for the test set? QSAR Comb. Sci. 2005;24:385–396. doi: 10.1002/qsar.200430909. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous