Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;98(2):434-449.
doi: 10.1111/brv.12913. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

The phenotypic costs of captivity

Affiliations

The phenotypic costs of captivity

Ross Crates et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

The breeding of threatened species in captivity for release is a central tool in conservation biology. Given gloomy predictions for biodiversity trends in the Anthropocene, captive breeding will play an increasingly important role in preventing future extinctions. Relative to the wild, captive environments drastically alter selection pressures on animals. Phenotypic change in captive animals in response to these altered selection pressures can incur fitness costs post-release, jeopardising their potential contribution to population recovery. We explore the ways in which captive environments can hinder the expression of wild phenotypes. We also stress that the phenotypes of captive-bred animals differ from their wild counterparts in multiple ways that remain poorly understood. We propose five new research questions relating to the impact of captive phenotypes on reintroduction biology. With better use of monitoring and experimental reintroductions, a more robust evidence base should help inform adaptive management and minimise the phenotypic costs of captivity, improving the success of animal reintroductions.

Keywords: animal behaviour; animal husbandry; conservation; natural selection; phenotypic change; reintroduction biology; threatened species recovery; zoology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Almberg, E. S., Cross, P. C., Dobson, A. P., Smith, D. W. & Hudson, P. J. (2012). Parasite invasion following host reintroduction: a case study of Yellowstone's wolves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, 2840-2851.
    1. Araki, H., Cooper, B. & Blouin, M. S. (2007). Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318, 100-103.
    1. Araki, H., Cooper, B. & Blouin, M. S. (2009). Carry-over effect of captive breeding reduces reproductive fitness of wild-born descendants in the wild. Biology Letters 5, 621-624.
    1. Armstrong, D. P. & Perrott, J. K. (2000). An experiment testing whether condition and survival are limited by food supply in a reintroduced hihi population. Conservation Biology 14, 1171-1181.
    1. Aydinonat, D., Penn, D. J., Smith, S., Moodley, Y., Hoelzl, F., Knauer, F. & Schwarzenberger, F. (2014). Social isolation shortens telomeres in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus erithacus). PLoS One 9, e93839.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources