Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;24(1):e13525.
doi: 10.1111/obr.13525. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review

Affiliations

Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review

Moosa Alsubhi et al. Obes Rev. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Food retail strategies to improve the healthiness of food and beverage options may increase purchasing of healthier options and improve diets. Consumer demand for healthier options is an important determinant of the successful implementation and maintenance of healthy food retail interventions. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was undertaken to explore whether consumers are willing to pay more for healthier foods and to determine the key factors that influence willingness to pay. Fifteen studies reported the results of 26 experiments providing willingness to pay estimates for healthier food products across a range of food retail environments. Twenty three out of the 26 experiments included in this review (88.5%) found consumers would pay a 5.6% to 91.5% (mean 30.7%) price premium for healthier foods. Studies consistently found a positive willingness to pay for foods with reduced fat and wholegrains with additional fruit and vegetables, while willingness to pay for foods with reduced salt or a combination of low fat and sugar, or salt showed mixed results. Adults over 60 years, females, those living with obesity, and consumers who aim to maintain a healthy lifestyle were more likely to pay a price premium for healthier food, whereas younger consumers, consumers with healthy weight, and consumers with higher levels of education were less likely to pay higher prices. The results of this review contribute to our understanding of consumer preferences for healthier products and provide information to retailers on consumer surplus (benefits) associated with the provision of healthier food alternatives.

Keywords: dietary guidelines; healthy food retail; healthy interventions; willingness to pay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of included studies, review of consumer willingness to pay for healthy food, and beverages, 2000–2021

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beaglehole R, Yach D. Globalisation and the prevention and control of non‐communicable disease: the neglected chronic diseases of adults. Lancet. 2003;362(9387):903‐908. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14335-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crosland P, Ananthapavan J, Davison J, Lambert M, Carter R. The health burden of preventable disease in Australia: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43(2):163‐170. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12882 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation . Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. In: Implementation Plan: Executive Summary; Report No.: WHO/NMH/PND/ECHO/17.1. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
    1. Hawkes C, Jewell J, Allen K. A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet‐related non‐communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework. Obes Rev. 2013;14(Suppl 2):159‐168. doi:10.1111/obr.12098 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Swinburn B, Sacks G, Vandevijvere S, et al. INFORMAS (international network for food and obesity/non‐communicable diseases research, monitoring and action support): overview and key principles. Obes Rev. 2013;14(Suppl 1):1‐12. doi:10.1111/obr.12087 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types