Children, young people and parent engagement in health intervention design and implementation: A scoping review
- PMID: 36346148
- PMCID: PMC9854306
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.13572
Children, young people and parent engagement in health intervention design and implementation: A scoping review
Abstract
Introduction: Engaging children and young people (CYP) with and without their parents in health research has the potential to improve the development and implementation of health interventions. However, to our knowledge, the scope of engagement activities used with this population and barriers to their engagement is unknown. The objective of this review was to identify and describe CYP engagement with and without their parents in the development and/or implementation of health interventions.
Methods: This scoping review included any primary research studies reporting on engaging CYP, with or without parents, in the design and/or implementation of health interventions. Healthcare professionals had to be involved over the course of the study and the study had to take place in either community, primary or tertiary care settings. The following databases were searched in May 2017, May 2020 and June 2021: Medline (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Embase (Elsevier). Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles and used a previously piloted extraction form to extract and summarize information from the included articles.
Results: Twenty-eight articles discussing twenty-four studies were included. CYP engagement throughout the research cycle was limited. There were no observed differences in the reported presence of engagement, types of interventions or outcomes of engagement between studies engaging CYP or CYP and parents. Studies engaging CYP and parents contained limited information on how these relationships affected outcomes of engagement. Engagement was enabled primarily by the maintenance of resources and relationships among stakeholders.
Conclusions: Although CYP engagement often influenced health intervention and implementation design, they are inconsistently engaged across the research cycle. It is unclear whether parental involvement enhances CYP engagement. Future research should consider reporting guidelines to clarify the level of CYP and/or parent engagement, and enhance CYP engagement by fostering synergistic and sustainable partnerships with key stakeholders.
Patient or public contribution: A parent partner with codesign experience contributed to the creation of the research questions, screened titles, abstracts and full texts, helped with data extraction and provided feedback on the manuscript.
Keywords: children; engagement; health interventions; parent; young people.
© 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Engaging Children and Young People in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review of Modes of Delivery, Facilitators, and Barriers.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e16317. doi: 10.2196/16317. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32442160 Free PMC article.
-
Impacts of parental technoference on parent-child relationships and child health and developmental outcomes: a scoping review protocol.Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 17;11(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01918-3. Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35300734 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 38343084 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Best Practices Guidelines for the Engagement of People With Lived Experience and Family Members in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study.Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70152. doi: 10.1111/hex.70152. Health Expect. 2025. PMID: 39832210 Free PMC article.
-
Commonalities and distinctions of pediatric patient and family engagement in clinical care, education, and research contexts: Protocol for a scoping review.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0330104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330104. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40779509 Free PMC article.
-
Co-designing interventions to improve emergency department discharge communication with youths, parents and healthcare providers: a process evaluation.Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jun 1;9:100362. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100362. eCollection 2025 Dec. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025. PMID: 40600235 Free PMC article.
-
Codesign of Mental Health Interventions With Young People From Racially Minoritised Populations: A Systematic Review of Methods and Outcomes.Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70204. doi: 10.1111/hex.70204. Health Expect. 2025. PMID: 40047285 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research . Strategy for patient‐oriented research—CIHR. April 1, 2019. Accessed March 19, 2019. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41204.html
-
- Government of Canada CI of HR . Strategy for patient‐oriented research—patient engagement framework—CIHR. July 2, 2014. Accessed July 8, 2020. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html#a4
-
- National Institute for Health Research . NIHR annual report 2015/16: National Institute for Health Research. Accessed March 18, 2019. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/about-us/documents/NIHR-Annual-Report-2015-16.pdf
-
- National Institute of Health Research . INVOLVE | INVOLVE supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Accessed March 18, 2019. https://www.invo.org.uk/