[18F]FAPI PET/CT in the evaluation of focal liver lesions with [18F]FDG non-avidity
- PMID: 36346437
- DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06022-1
[18F]FAPI PET/CT in the evaluation of focal liver lesions with [18F]FDG non-avidity
Abstract
Purpose: This prospective study was aimed to investigate the potential utility of [18F]fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT for evaluating focal liver lesions (FLLs) with [18F]FDG non-avidity.
Methods: From January 2021 to March 2022, this prospective study included 80 FLLs that were not avid on [18F]FDG PET/CT from 37 patients, then underwent [18F]FAPI PET/CT. All patients with FLL(s) with biopsy-proof or follow-up confirmation were categorized into four subgroups (20 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs]/5 non-HCC malignancies/4 inflammatory FLLs/8 benign noninflammatory FLLs). The diagnostic value of [18F]FAPI for detecting liver malignancy was determined by visual evaluation. Differences in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and lesion-to-background ratio (LBR) obtained from [18F]FAPI PET/CT among the four subgroups were analyzed by semiquantitative analysis.
Results: Among the thirty-seven enrolled participants (34 males; median age 57 years, range 48-67 years), on visual evaluation, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [18F]FAPI PET for detecting liver malignancy in the patient-based analysis were 96.0% (24/25), 58.3% (7/12), and 83.8% (31/37), respectively. On semiquantitative analysis, the SUVmax and LBR of [18F]FAPI PET in liver malignancy (33 HCC lesions; 19 non-HCC malignant lesions) were significantly higher than those in 11 benign noninflammatory FLLs [HCC: SUVmax: 6.4 vs. 4.5, P = 0.017; LBR: 5.1 vs. 1.5, P = 0.003; non-HCC: SUVmax: 5.5 vs. 4.5, P = 0.008; LBR: 4.4 vs. 1.5, P = 0.042]. Notably, there was no significant difference in the SUVmax of [18F]FAPI PET between 33 HCC lesions and 17 inflammatory FLLs (6.4 vs. 8.2, P = 0.37), but the LBR of [18F]FAPI PET in HCC were significantly lower than that in inflammatory FLLs (5.1 vs. 9.1, P = 0.003).
Conclusions: [18F]FAPI PET/CT shows high sensitivity in detecting HCC and non-HCC malignancy with [18F]FDG non-avidity. [18F]FAPI might be a promising radiopharmaceutical for the differential diagnosis of benign noninflammatory FLLs and liver malignancy with [18F]FDG non-avidity.
Keywords: Cancer-associated fibroblasts; Focal liver lesions; Hepatocellular carcinoma; PET/CT; [18F]FAPI.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Head-to-head comparison of 18F-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer Imaging. 2023 Oct 30;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00626-y. Cancer Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37899452 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic and diagnostic value of [18F]FDG, 11C-acetate, and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for hepatocellular carcinoma.Eur Radiol. 2025 Jul;35(7):4121-4131. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11352-3. Epub 2025 Jan 21. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39838091
-
Comparison of PET imaging of activated fibroblasts and 18F-FDG for diagnosis of primary hepatic tumours: a prospective pilot study.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 May;48(5):1593-1603. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05070-9. Epub 2020 Oct 24. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33097975
-
Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in primary liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hell J Nucl Med. 2023 May-Aug;26(2):123-131. doi: 10.1967/s002449912575. Epub 2023 Aug 4. Hell J Nucl Med. 2023. PMID: 37527048
-
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of FAPI PET/CT in Oncologic Studies: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.J Nucl Med. 2023 Aug;64(8):1218-1224. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265471. Epub 2023 Jun 8. J Nucl Med. 2023. PMID: 37290798
Cited by
-
The Superiority of Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT Versus FDG PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Various Malignancies.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 13;15(4):1193. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041193. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36831535 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative analysis of two timepoints on [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT in various cancers.Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2023 Dec 11;7(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41824-023-00186-1. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2023. PMID: 38072888 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Performances of PET/CT Using Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 29;25(13):7197. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137197. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39000301 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical applications of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor positron emission tomography (FAPI-PET).Npj Imaging. 2024 Nov 13;2(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s44303-024-00053-z. Npj Imaging. 2024. PMID: 40604259 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Head-to-head comparison of 18F-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer Imaging. 2023 Oct 30;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00626-y. Cancer Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37899452 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018;391:1301–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30010-2 . - DOI
-
- Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A, Rodrigues PM, Khan SA, Roberts LR, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:557–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-020-0310-z . - DOI
-
- Blodgett TM, Meltzer CC, Townsend DW. PET/CT: form and function. Radiology. 2007;242:360–85. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422051113 . - DOI
-
- Tsurusaki M, Okada M, Kuroda H, Matsuki M, Ishii K, Murakami T. Clinical application of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessment and evaluation after therapy for malignant hepatic tumor. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-013-0790-5 . - DOI
-
- Park JW, Ji HK, Seok KK, Keon WK, Kyung WP, Choi J Il, et al. A prospective evaluation of 18F-FDG and 11C-acetate PET/CT for detection of primary and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1912–21. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.055087
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical