Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;182(1):25-30.
doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04678-3. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

Quality of life of pediatric patients operated for pilonidal sinus disease

Ciro Esposito  1 , Benedetta Lepore  2 , Mariapina Cerulo  1 , Rachele Borgogni  1 , Fulvia Del Conte  1 , Vincenzo Coppola  1 , Claudia Di Mento  1 , Roberto Carulli  1 , Roberto Cardone  1 , Giuseppe Cortese  3 , Giorgia Esposito  1 , Maria Escolino  1
Affiliations
Review

Quality of life of pediatric patients operated for pilonidal sinus disease

Ciro Esposito et al. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) outcome is an ideal method for determining the efficacy of a surgical treatment. In children operated for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), open procedures imply prolonged wound care, significant morbidity, and high recurrence rates. Endoscopic treatment (PEPSIT) overcomes these limitations. We report our experience in the management of PSD to evaluate the QOL of patients undergoing open and endoscopic treatment. The records of 177 patients undergoing surgery for PSD from 2008 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty patients were operated with open surgery (G1) and 157 with PEPSIT (G2). We analyzed QOL through the following criteria: hospital stay (HS), healing time (HT), return to sport (RTSp), return to school (RTSc), resumption of social life (RSL), and recurrence rate and reoperation (RRR). Moreover, we used Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) for a more subjective evaluation of life satisfaction. We found significant differences in all the analyzed criteria: HS varied from 3 to 7 days in G1 and from 1 to 2 days in G2; HT from 40 to 75 days in G1 while from 20 to 41 days in G2; RTSp from 50 to 80 days in G1 while from 7 to 21 days in G2; RTSc from 9 to 15 days in G1 while from 2 to 4 days in G2; RSL from 13 to 20 days in G1 while from 2 to 5 days in G2; RRR was 25% in G1 and 4.4% in G2.

Conclusion: Endoscopic treatment (PEPSIT) significantly improves the quality of life of patients operated for PSD. Compared to open surgery, PEPSIT presents shorter hospital stay, faster healing time, return to sport activities, return to school and resumption of a normal social life, and lower rates of recurrence and reoperation. In addition, PQ-LES-Q demonstrated a good overall quality of life and life satisfaction. Further prospective studies should be obtained to consider PEPSIT as the gold standard for the treatment of PSD in pediatric patients.

What is known: • Many techniques have been proposed in the last 20 years for the surgical treatment of PSD. • PEPSIT is showing promising results in terms of safety and long-term efficacy.

What is new: • The main impact in QOL of patients operated with PEPSIT is on their daily activity, including a shorter hospital stay, faster healing time, return to sport activities, return to school and resumption of a normal social life, lower rates of recurrence and reoperation. • After PEPSIT, children maintain a satisfactory quality of life according to the analysis of PQ-LES-Q.

Keywords: Children; PEPSIT; PSD; Pilonidal sinus disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Variables proposed to influence health-related quality of life according to Ferrans et al. [17]. Bullet lists did not appear in the original model and were added exclusively for this study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Søndenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Søreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):39–42. doi: 10.1007/BF00337585. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bendewald FP, Cima RR. Pilonidal disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2007;20(2):86–95. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-977486. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCallum IJ, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2008;336(7649):868–871. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39517.808160.BE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esposito C, Izzo S, Turrà F, Cerulo M, Severino G, Settimi A, Iannazzone M, Masieri L, Cortese G, Escolino M. Pediatric endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment, a revolutionary technique to adopt in children with pilonidal sinus fistulas: our preliminary experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(3):359–363. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0246. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pini Prato A, Mazzola C, Mattioli G, Escolino M, Esposito C, D'Alessio A, Abati LC, Leonelli L, Carlini C, Rotundi F, Meinero PC. Preliminary report on endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment in children: results of a multicentric series. Pediatr Surg Int. 2018;34(6):687–692. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4262-0. - DOI - PubMed