Predictors of and predictive nomogram for cut-out of proximal femur nail anti-rotation device in intertrochanteric fractures
- PMID: 36348087
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04676-y
Predictors of and predictive nomogram for cut-out of proximal femur nail anti-rotation device in intertrochanteric fractures
Abstract
Purpose: This study determined independent predictors and developed a predictive nomogram for failed correction of intertrochanteric fractures due to cut-out of the proximal femur nail anti-rotation (PFNA) device.
Methods: Demographic and radiological data of 592 adult patients with intertrochanteric fractures (AO 31A) treated by PFNA were collected retrospectively. Independent predictors of cut-out were obtained through univariate and multivariate analyses, and a predictive nomogram was established. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the nomogram were based on receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, respectively.
Results: Overall, 18 (3.04%) cases of cut-out occurred. Independent predictors according to the multivariate analysis were body mass index (BMI), poor-to-acceptable quality of reduction, PFNA blade position, and tip-apex distance (TAD). AUC of the nomogram was 0.849, and C-index was 0.849 (95% CI [0.844-0.854]). Bootstrapping yielded a corrected C-index of 0.849. The calibration and decision curves indicated good agreement and clinical benefit of the nomogram.
Conclusion: A reliable predictive nomogram was developed for cut-out of the PFNA in intertrochanteric fractures, based on BMI, quality of reduction, blade position, and TAD.
Keywords: Cut-out; Intertrochanteric fracture; Nomogram; PFNA.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Predictive indicators of proximal femur nail antirotation device cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures: introduction of a novel radiographic parameter.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 26;145(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05937-2. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025. PMID: 40418359
-
Risk factors for mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fractures after fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA II): a study in a Southeast Asian population.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Apr;141(4):569-575. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03399-2. Epub 2020 Apr 15. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021. PMID: 32296964
-
Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for internal fixation failure after proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nailing in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e40575. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040575. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39809193 Free PMC article.
-
No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Dec;32(8):1617-1625. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03124-8. Epub 2021 Oct 19. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022. PMID: 34665292
-
A rare complication of pelvic perforation by an excessive medial slide of the helical blade after treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation: A case report and literature review.Chin J Traumatol. 2022 Mar;25(2):118-121. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 12. Chin J Traumatol. 2022. PMID: 34509352 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Research Progress on the Treatment of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Proximal Femur Bionic Nails (PFBNs).Orthop Surg. 2024 Oct;16(10):2303-2310. doi: 10.1111/os.14134. Epub 2024 Jul 9. Orthop Surg. 2024. PMID: 38982572 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment of irreducible intertrochanteric femoral fracture with a minimally invasive clamp reduction technique via the anterior approach.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 4;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03641-8. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 36871013 Free PMC article.
-
Research on Classification Criteria for the Reducibility and Irreducibility of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures.Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(6):1852-1866. doi: 10.1111/os.70055. Epub 2025 May 3. Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 40317913 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive indicators of proximal femur nail antirotation device cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures: introduction of a novel radiographic parameter.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 26;145(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05937-2. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025. PMID: 40418359
-
Evaluation of reduction quality and implant positioning in intertrochanteric fracture fixation: A review of key radiographic parameters.World J Orthop. 2025 Aug 18;16(8):106982. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.106982. eCollection 2025 Aug 18. World J Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40838220 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- White SM, Griffiths R (2011) Projected incidence of proximal femoral fracture in England: a report from the NHS Hip Fracture Anaesthesia Network (HIPFAN). Injury 42(11):1230–1233 - PubMed
-
- Anglen JO, Weinstein JN (2008) Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(4):700–7 - PubMed
-
- Matre K et al (2013) Sliding hip screw versus IM nail in reverse oblique trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A study of 2716 patients in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register. Injury 44(6):735–42 - PubMed
-
- Shen L et al (2013) Antirotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(4):377–383 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous