Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Nov 9;17(1):13.
doi: 10.1186/s13010-022-00126-0.

The severity of moral distress in nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The severity of moral distress in nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nader Salari et al. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. .

Abstract

Background: Moral distress is one of the most important problems that nurses face in their care of patients. Various studies have reported the frequency and severity of moral distress in nurses. However, to date, a comprehensive study that shows the results of these research across the world was not found, therefore due to the importance of this issue, its role in the health of nurses and patients, and the lack of general statistics about it worldwide, the present study was conducted to determine the frequency and severity of moral distress in nurses through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: In this review study, searching national and international databases of SID, MagIran, IranMedex, IranDoc, Google Scholar, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, CINHAL, PubMed, and Web of Science (WoS) between 2005 and February 2020 were extracted. The random-effects model was used for analysis, and the heterogeneity of studies with the I2 index was investigated. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2).

Results: The frequency of moral distress in 9 articles with a sample size of 1576 persons was 1.7 ± 0.5 from (0-4), in 13 articles with a sample size of 1870 persons, 3.07 ± 0.1 from (0-5), in 6 articles with a sample size of 1316 persons, 3.2 ± 0.29 from (0-6), in 18 articles with a sample size of 1959 persons, 4.6 ± 0.518 from (1-7) and in 35 articles with a sample size of 3718 persons, 81.1 ± 4.6 from (216-30), and the severity of moral distress in 4 articles with a sample size of 1116 persons, 1.7 ± 0.37 from (0-4), in 5 articles with a sample size of 1282 persons, 2.6 ± 0.28 from (0-5), in 5 articles with a sample size of 944 persons, 3.9 ± 0.63 from (0-6) and in 8 articles with a sample size of 901 persons was 82.3 ± 5.4 (0-216).

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the frequency and severity of moral distress in nurses are high and are a serious problem in nurses. Therefore, policymakers in this field should consider its role in the health of nurses and patients.

Keywords: Frequency; Meta-analysis; Moral distress; Nurses; Severity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency of moral distress in nurses and 95% confidence interval in the group (0–4). The middle point of each line segment shows the frequency of moral distress in each study, and the diamond shape shows the frequency of moral distress in nurses for the entire study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency of moral distress in nurses and 95% confidence interval in the group (0–5). The middle point of each line segment shows the frequency of moral distress in each study, and the diamond shape shows the frequency of moral distress in nurses for the entire study
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Frequency of moral distress in nurses and 95% confidence interval in the group (0–6). The middle point of each line segment shows the frequency of moral distress in each study, and the diamond shape shows the frequency of moral distress in nurses for the entire study
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Frequency of moral distress in nurses and 95% confidence interval in the group (1–7). The middle point of each line segment shows the frequency of moral distress in each study, and the diamond shape shows the frequency of moral distress in nurses for the entire study
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Frequency of moral distress in nurses and 95% confidence interval in the group (0–216). The middle point of each line segment shows the frequency of moral distress in each study, and the diamond shape shows the frequency of moral distress in nurses for the entire study
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Severity of moral distress in nurses and 95% confidence interval in the group (0–4). The middle point of each line segment shows the severity of moral distress in each study, and the diamond shape shows the severity of moral distress in nurses for the entire study
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Severity of moral distress in nurses and 95% confidence interval in the group (0–5). The middle point of each line segment shows the severity of moral distress in each study, and the diamond shape shows the severity of moral distress in nurses for the entire study
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Severity of moral distress in nurses and 95% confidence interval in group (0–6). The middle point of each line segment shows the severity of moral distress in each study, and the diamond shape shows the severity of moral distress in nurses for the entire study
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Severity of moral distress in nurses and 95% confidence interval in group (0–216). The middle point of each line segment shows the severity of moral distress in each study, and the diamond shape shows the severity of moral distress in nurses for the entire study

References

    1. Gallagher A. Moral distress and moral courage in everyday nursing practice. OJIN. 2010;16(2). - PubMed
    1. Shakerinia I. Relationship between moral distress, psychological hardiness and occupational burnout in the nursing. Iranian J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2010;4:56–69.
    1. Kalantari S, Abbaszadeh A, Borhani F. The relationship between moral distress and job satisfaction of nurses in health centers in bam, 2012. [MA dissertation] Bam: Kerman Univ Med Sci, Bam Int Unit; 2012.
    1. Austin W, Rankel M, Kagan L, Bergum V, Lemermeyer G. To stay or to go, to speak or stay silent, to act or not to act: moral distress as experienced by psychologists. Ethics Behav. 2005;15(3):197–212. - PubMed
    1. Rice EM, Rady MY, Hamrick A, Verheijde JL, Pendergast DK. Determinants of moral distress in medical and surgical nurses at an adult acute tertiary care hospital. J Nurs Manag. 2008;16(3):360–373. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources