Effects and Proposed Countermeasures of Abortion Bans and Restrictions on People With Uteruses and Society
- PMID: 36348848
- PMCID: PMC9632542
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29906
Effects and Proposed Countermeasures of Abortion Bans and Restrictions on People With Uteruses and Society
Abstract
With the recent overturning of Roe V. Wade by the Supreme Court, access to abortions in many regions across the United States will become very limited as laws regarding fetal termination will be determined by state legislators rather than on a federal level. This article highlights the effects of Roe V. Wade's abolishment on individuals that can get pregnant, how unwanted pregnancies will affect society in general, and reasonable steps forward following the ban. We conducted an electronic search using PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar. The search was retrospective, and the preliminary results focused on articles about the rationale behind pregnancy termination and the overall effects of abortion and the ban. Review papers, original papers, and newspaper articles were eligible for use. Sample size and region of publication were not exclusionary criteria. Each author independently reviewed and extracted data to write up each assigned section, and group collaborations occurred to create the final draft. Out of the 93 resources reviewed, 32 sources were deemed eligible and used in this article. These resources included 23 journal articles, eight websites, and one book.. The data gathered showed that while abortions have many potential complications even when performed under regulated conditions, taking away the choice of those with a uterus is also not without consequence. The economic, familial, and societal implications should be considered moving forward as safety nets will need to be implemented for people with uterus and children involved.
Keywords: abortion; abortion 2022; abortion ban and restrictions; abortion grounds; abortion laws and society; fetal anomalies; illegal abortion; maternal health care; roe v. wade; therapeutic abortion.
Copyright © 2022, Disi et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
The Medical and Financial Burden of Illegal Abortion.Cureus. 2022 Oct 20;14(10):e30514. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30514. eCollection 2022 Oct. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36415416 Free PMC article.
-
Medical Implications of Restricting Abortions on Women Diagnosed With Fetal Anomalies Following the Overturn of Roe v. Wade: A Scoping Review.Cureus. 2024 Apr 25;16(4):e58994. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58994. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38800251 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8. Womens Health Issues. 1993. PMID: 8274872
-
The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care.Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 5;14:1087045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1087045. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37215676 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of New and Renewed Restrictive State Abortion Laws on Pregnancy-Capable People with Diabetes.Curr Diab Rep. 2023 Aug;23(8):175-184. doi: 10.1007/s11892-023-01512-4. Epub 2023 May 22. Curr Diab Rep. 2023. PMID: 37213059 Review.
References
-
- Termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality incompatible with life: women's experiences in Brazil. Ferreira da Costa L, Hardy E, Duarte Osis MJ, Faúndes A. Reprod Health Matters. 2005;13:139–146. - PubMed
-
- First trimester surgical abortion. Tristan SB, Gilliam M. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52:151–159. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources