2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Takayasu Arteritis
- PMID: 36349501
- DOI: 10.1002/art.42324
2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Takayasu Arteritis
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate new classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK).
Methods: Patients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in 6 phases: 1) identification of candidate criteria items, 2) collection of candidate items present at diagnosis, 3) expert panel review of cases, 4) data-driven reduction of candidate items, 5) derivation of a points-based classification score in a development data set, and 6) validation in an independent data set.
Results: The development data set consisted of 316 cases of TAK and 323 comparators. The validation data set consisted of an additional 146 cases of TAK and 127 comparators. Age ≤60 years at diagnosis and imaging evidence of large-vessel vasculitis were absolute requirements to classify a patient as having TAK. The final criteria items and weights were as follows: female sex (+1), angina (+2), limb claudication (+2), arterial bruit (+2), reduced upper extremity pulse (+2), reduced pulse or tenderness of a carotid artery (+2), blood pressure difference between arms of ≥20 mm Hg (+1), number of affected arterial territories (+1 to +3), paired artery involvement (+1), and abdominal aorta plus renal or mesenteric involvement (+3). A patient could be classified as having TAK with a cumulative score of ≥5 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation data set, the model area under the curve was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.94-0.99) with a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI 88.6-97.1%) and specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 96.7-100.0%).
Conclusion: The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for TAK are now validated for use in research.
© 2022 American College of Rheumatology.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, et al. 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:1-11.
-
- Aggarwal R, Ringold S, Khanna D, et al. Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria? [review]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:891-7.
-
- Arend WP, Michel BA, Bloch DA, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1129-34.
-
- Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, Clark TM, Hoffman GS. Limitations of therapy and a guarded prognosis in an American cohort of Takayasu arteritis patients. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:1000-9.
-
- Singh JA, Solomon DH, Dougados M, et al. Development of classification and response criteria for rheumatic diseases [editorial]. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:348-52.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
