Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;63(1):171-181.
doi: 10.1111/trf.17175. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

Communicating the move to individualized donor selection policy: Framing messages focused on recipients and safety

Eamonn Ferguson  1   2 , Sarah Bowen  3   4 , Claire Lawrence  5 , Chris Starmer  3 , Abigail Barr  3 , Katy Davison  6 , Claire Reynolds  7 , Susan R Brailsford  7
Affiliations

Communicating the move to individualized donor selection policy: Framing messages focused on recipients and safety

Eamonn Ferguson et al. Transfusion. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) have been deferred from donating blood. However, recent evidence supports the adoption of donor screening based on individuals' sexual behavior over population-based criteria. We explore how best to frame communications about adopting this change to minimize any potential negative consequences (e.g., reduced donor numbers). We examine the effectiveness of risk (emphasizing safety vs. emphasizing low risk), and focus (donor vs. recipient) frames on intentions to donate blood (approach) or feeling deterred from donating (avoid), and mechanisms linked to under-reporting sexual behavior.

Study design and methods: We conducted a 2 (risk frame: risk vs. safety) by 3 (focus: donor vs. recipient vs. both) between-subjects online experiment (n = 2677). The main outcomes were intentions to donate and feelings of being put-off/deterred from donating (both for self and others). We also assessed the extent that forgetting, embarrassment/shame, and question irrelevance were perceived to be associated with under-reporting sexual behavior.

Results: Frames that focused on safety or a recipient resulted in people reporting being less deterred from donating. Regardless of frame, people from ethnic minorities were more likely to feel deterred. Embarrassment/shame followed by forgetting and perceived irrelevance were the main reasons for under-reporting sexual behaviors, especially in ethnic minorities, and smartphones were perceived as an acceptable memory aid for sexual behavior.

Discussion: Blood services moving to an individualized policy should frame donor selection in terms of safety and/or a recipient focus, explore sensitivities in ethnic minority communities, consider ways to normalize reporting sexual behavior, and use smartphones as a memory aid.

Keywords: behavior; framing; individualized; risk; safety; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Sampling strategy (1, 2 & 3 = sampling rounds 1, 2 & 3 respectively)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Risk frames (risk vs. safety) by focus (donor, recipient or both)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fisayo T. Science in action? A critical view of UK blood donation deferral policy and men who have sex with men. Int J Health Plann. 2021;36:1207–22. - PubMed
    1. Haire B, Whitford K, Kaldor JM. Blood donor deferral for men who have sex with men: still room to move. Transfusion. 2018;58:816–22. - PubMed
    1. Goldman M, W‐Y Shih A, O'Brien SF, Devine D. Donor deferral policies for men who have sex with men: past, present and future. Vox Sang. 2018;113:95–103. - PubMed
    1. Davison KL, Reynolds CA, Andrews V, Brailsford SR. Blood donation by men who have sex with men: using evidence to change policy. Vox Sang. 2021;116:260–72. - PubMed
    1. Caffrey N, Goldman M, Osmond L, Yi QL, Fan W, O'Brien SF. HIV incidence and compliance with deferral criteria over three progressively shorter time deferrals for men who have sex with men in Canada. Transfusion. 2022;62:125–34. - PubMed

Publication types