Women's preference to apply shared decision-making in breast cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment
- PMID: 36351714
- PMCID: PMC9644356
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064488
Women's preference to apply shared decision-making in breast cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment
Abstract
Objective: To analyse women's stated preferences for establishing the relative importance of each attribute of shared decision-making (SDM) and their willingness to pay (WTP) for more participatory care in breast cancer screening programmes (BCSP).
Design: A discrete choice experiment was designed with 12 questions (choice tasks). It included three attributes: 'How the information is obtained', regarding benefits and harms; whether there is a 'Dialogue for scheduled mammography' between the healthcare professional and the woman; and, 'Who makes the decision', regarding participation in BCSP. Data were obtained using a survey that included 12 choice tasks, 1 question on WTP and 7 socioeconomic-related questions. The analysis was performed using conditional mixed-effect logit regression and stratification according to WTP.
Setting: Data collection related to BCSP was conducted between June and November 2021 in Catalonia, Spain.
Participants: Sixty-five women aged between 50 and 60.
Main outcome measures: Women's perceived utility of each attribute, trade-off on these attributes and WTP for SDM in BCSP.
Result: The only significant attribute was 'Who makes the decision'. The decision made alone (coefficient=2.879; 95% CI=2.297 to 3.461) and the decision made together with a healthcare professional (2.375; 95% CI=1.573 to 3.177) were the options preferred by women. The former contributes 21% more utility than the latter. Moreover, 52.3% of the women stated a WTP of €10 or more for SDM. Women's preferences regarding attributes did not influence their WTP.
Conclusions: The participant women refused a current paternalistic model and preferred either SDM or informed decision-making in BCSP.
Keywords: Breast tumours; HEALTH ECONOMICS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIMARY CARE.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):551-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00459.x. Epub 2008 Sep 16. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 18798807
-
The effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision-making: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2017 Sep 12;18(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2161-7. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28899412 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Women's Benefits and Harms Trade-Offs in Breast Cancer Screening: Results from a Discrete-Choice Experiment.Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 18. Value Health. 2018. PMID: 29304944
-
Assessing women's stated preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1501. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11847-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39609836 Free PMC article.
-
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30030738 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Aug;43(8):879-936. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y. Epub 2025 May 21. Pharmacoeconomics. 2025. PMID: 40397369 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, et al. . Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1995;273:149–54. - PubMed
-
- Institut Catal d’Oncologia, de C ncer de Mama DP . [Early breast cancer detection], 2020. Available: http://gencat.cat/ca/el-cancer/programes_de_deteccio_precoc/programa_de_...
-
- Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Instituto Nacional de Estadística . Encuesta europea de Salud en España EESE 2020 [European survey of health in Spain EESE 2020]. Madrid: ministerio de sanidad, 2022. Available: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/EncuestaEuropea/En...