Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):e064488.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064488.

Women's preference to apply shared decision-making in breast cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment

Affiliations

Women's preference to apply shared decision-making in breast cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment

María José Hernández-Leal et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To analyse women's stated preferences for establishing the relative importance of each attribute of shared decision-making (SDM) and their willingness to pay (WTP) for more participatory care in breast cancer screening programmes (BCSP).

Design: A discrete choice experiment was designed with 12 questions (choice tasks). It included three attributes: 'How the information is obtained', regarding benefits and harms; whether there is a 'Dialogue for scheduled mammography' between the healthcare professional and the woman; and, 'Who makes the decision', regarding participation in BCSP. Data were obtained using a survey that included 12 choice tasks, 1 question on WTP and 7 socioeconomic-related questions. The analysis was performed using conditional mixed-effect logit regression and stratification according to WTP.

Setting: Data collection related to BCSP was conducted between June and November 2021 in Catalonia, Spain.

Participants: Sixty-five women aged between 50 and 60.

Main outcome measures: Women's perceived utility of each attribute, trade-off on these attributes and WTP for SDM in BCSP.

Result: The only significant attribute was 'Who makes the decision'. The decision made alone (coefficient=2.879; 95% CI=2.297 to 3.461) and the decision made together with a healthcare professional (2.375; 95% CI=1.573 to 3.177) were the options preferred by women. The former contributes 21% more utility than the latter. Moreover, 52.3% of the women stated a WTP of €10 or more for SDM. Women's preferences regarding attributes did not influence their WTP.

Conclusions: The participant women refused a current paternalistic model and preferred either SDM or informed decision-making in BCSP.

Keywords: Breast tumours; HEALTH ECONOMICS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIMARY CARE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of a choice task for conventional (first version) and narrative (final version).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Net follow-up of survey responses. 1) Attach ethics committe approval. 2) Spanish and Catalan language survey link. 3) If the participants do not respond to the invitation or survey after three attempts, delete them from database.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flowchart of participants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, et al. . Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1995;273:149–54. - PubMed
    1. Walter LC, Lewis CL, Barton MB. Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence. Am J Med 2005;118:1078–86. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.063 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49. 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institut Catal d’Oncologia, de C ncer de Mama DP . [Early breast cancer detection], 2020. Available: http://gencat.cat/ca/el-cancer/programes_de_deteccio_precoc/programa_de_...
    1. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Instituto Nacional de Estadística . Encuesta europea de Salud en España EESE 2020 [European survey of health in Spain EESE 2020]. Madrid: ministerio de sanidad, 2022. Available: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/EncuestaEuropea/En...

Publication types