Patients' with asplenia and doctors' experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis
- PMID: 36351729
- PMCID: PMC9644314
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060492
Patients' with asplenia and doctors' experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis
Abstract
Objective: To explore patients' with asplenia and general practitioners' (GPs) (1) perceptions of a novel, Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)-based, educational intervention which targets to increase adherence to post-splenectomy sepsis (PSS) prevention measures and (2) their experience in implementing prevention measures following this intervention.
Design: A process evaluation conducted on average 3.5 (for patients) and 3.8 (for GPs) months after the intervention between January 2020 and April 2021 individually by means of semi-structured guideline-based telephone interviews. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Participants: Volunteer subsample of N=25 patients with asplenia and N=8 GPs who received the intervention. Inclusion criteria were met by prior participation in the intervention (German-speaking, of full age and insured by the cooperating health insurance). Patient selection was done by purposeful selection aiming at maximum variability in terms of adherence to preventative measures prior to intervention participation. Participating GPs are a non-purposeful selected convenience sample. For reasons of data protection, no personal data was collected.
Results: The intervention was positively evaluated and its personal relevancy for patients and for the GPs' professional work became apparent. The intervention promoted risk awareness, intention to action, action planning and subsequently, improved adherence to preventative measures. Helpful factors for implementation among the patients were social support by relatives and GPs. Barriers to adherence identified in both groups can be divided into patient-attributed (eg, comorbidities), doctor-related (eg, lack of knowledge or support) as well as contextual factors (eg, vaccine supply constraints).
Conclusions: Our findings indicate a patient and GP perceived benefit of the intervention, but still identify prevailing barriers to implementation. In a further step, a quantitative evaluation of the intervention will be conducted and recommendations for integrating the intervention in usual care will be made.
Trial registration number: DRKS00015238.
Keywords: INFECTIOUS DISEASES; MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Prevention of post-splenectomy sepsis in patients with asplenia - a study protocol of a controlled trial.BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 14;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4752-2. BMC Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 31937251 Free PMC article.
-
Increased knowledge makes a difference! - general practitioners' experiences of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention: an interview study from the VIPVIZA trial.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Mar;39(1):77-84. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1882083. Epub 2021 Feb 11. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021. PMID: 33569981 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons from the failure of implementing the 'Better Care Better Value' prescribing indicator for renin-angiotensin system drugs in England: a qualitative study of general practitioners' perceptions using behavioural change framework.BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 23;10(6):e035910. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035910. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32580986 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting feasibility and acceptability of a practice-based educational intervention to support evidence-based prescribing: a qualitative study.Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):661-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh614. Epub 2004 Nov 4. Fam Pract. 2004. PMID: 15528289
-
Improving long-term adherence to statin therapy: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences in primary care.Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jun;68(671):e401-e407. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X696173. Epub 2018 Apr 23. Br J Gen Pract. 2018. PMID: 29686133 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Barriers and facilitators to optimal sepsis care - a systematized review of healthcare professionals' perspectives.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12777-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40275226 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Longterm efficacy of a patient focused intervention in patients with asplenia- a three year follow-up of the PrePPS trial.Infection. 2025 Aug;53(4):1449-1455. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02472-5. Epub 2025 Jan 29. Infection. 2025. PMID: 39878834 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Davies JM, Lewis MPN, Wimperis J, et al. . Review of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen: prepared on behalf of the British Committee for standards in haematology by a working party of the haemato-oncology task force. Br J Haematol 2011;155:308–17. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08843.x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous