Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
- PMID: 36352414
- PMCID: PMC9647909
- DOI: 10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1
Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients
Abstract
Background: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) serve as an alternative to short-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for providing intravenous access in hospitalized patients. Although a number of studies suggest that PICCs are associated with a lower risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) than CVCs, recent data concerning specific patient groups support the contrary. In this regard, we are comparing CVC- and PICC-related CLABSI rates developed in a selected group of critically ill inpatients and evaluating the CLABSI microbiological distribution.
Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Greece between May 2017 and May 2019. We performed a two-year retrospective analysis of the data collected from medical records of consecutive adult patients who underwent PICC or CVC placement.
Results: A total of 1187 CVCs placed for 9774 catheter-days and 639 PICCs placed for 11,110 catheter-days, were reported and analyzed during the study period. Among CVCs, a total of 59 (4.9%) CLABSIs were identified, while among PICCs, 18 (2.8%) cases presented CLABSI (p = 0.029). The CLABSI incidence rate per 1,000 catheter-days was 6.03 for CVC group and 1.62 for PICC group (p < 0.001). The CLABSI rate due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among the two groups was 3.17 in CVC group and 0.36 in PICC group (p < 0.001). Within CLABSI-CVC group, the most common microorganism detected was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (27.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (22%). In CLABSI-PICC group, the predominant microorganism was Candida spp. (33.3%) followed by non-MDR gram-negative pathogens (22.2%).
Conclusions: PICC lines were associated with significantly lower CLABSI rates comparing to CVC although they were in place longer than CVC lines. Given their longer time to the development of infection, PICCs may be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient IV access. The high prevalence of CLABSI-MDROs depicts the local microbial ecology, emphasizing the need of public health awareness.
Keywords: Bloodstream infection; Catheterization; Central line-associated bloodstream infection; Central venous catheter; Colonization; Insertion site; Peripherally inserted central catheter; Sepsis.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters.Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Aug 7;12(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01285-1. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023. PMID: 37550791 Free PMC article.
-
Central Venous Catheters versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A Comparison of Indwelling Time Resulting in Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 17;13(1):89. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010089. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38247648 Free PMC article.
-
Duration of central venous catheter placement and central line-associated bloodstream infections after the adoption of prevention bundles: a two-year retrospective study.Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Jul 15;11(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01131-w. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022. PMID: 35841083 Free PMC article.
-
The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):908-18. doi: 10.1086/671737. Epub 2013 Jul 26. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23917904
-
Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients.Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):489-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.489. Chest. 2005. PMID: 16100130 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical application of intracavitary electrocardiogram localization combined with ultrasound in central venous catheterization in critically ill patients: An observational study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38372. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038372. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 38847702 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a nomogram risk prediction model for PICC-related thrombosis in children with hematological malignancies.Clin Exp Med. 2025 Jun 10;25(1):195. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01707-x. Clin Exp Med. 2025. PMID: 40493285 Free PMC article.
-
Home care-based education for cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 30;33(7):639. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09667-4. Support Care Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40586980 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Healthcare Equipment and Personnel Reservoirs of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Epidemic Clones in Intensive Care Units in a Tunisian Hospital.Microorganisms. 2023 Oct 26;11(11):2637. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112637. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 38004649 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomical Structures to Be Concerned With During Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Procedures.J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Oct 23;38(41):e329. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e329. J Korean Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37873629 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous