Socio-economic determinants of attendance at diabetes self-management education program: using Andersen's behavioral model
- PMID: 36352439
- PMCID: PMC9644561
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08749-x
Socio-economic determinants of attendance at diabetes self-management education program: using Andersen's behavioral model
Abstract
Background: Diabetes self-management education is an effective factor for improving outcomes and quality of life in patients with diabetes. However, little information is available on the factors associated with participation or non-participation in self-management education programs in people with diabetes. The aim of this study was to explore the factors affecting on the attendance of patients with diabetes in the diabetes self-management education program.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 on 384 patients with diabetes referred to the main comprehensive health centers of Mashhad, Iran. All patients were linked with a diabetes self-management education program that lasted three months and involved 12 sessions. We explore the factors affecting on attending in diabetes self-management education program using Andersen's behavioral model. Data for independent variables (predisposing, enabling, and need factors) were gathered at the beginning of the training program using registration forms. Dependent variable (attendance of patients with diabetes in the training program) was checked at the end of the program. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done with SPSS v.25.
Results: The results of this study showed that women were less likely to participate in the self-management education program than men (OR=0.414; P<0.05). Also, age, travel time, health status and years with diabetes have negative significantly correlated with participation in the education program (P<0.05). The study showed that patients with diabetes aged≥65 were less participated in the training program than those ≤40 (OR=0.159; P<0.05). Also, patients who lived farther than 40 min away from training center were less likely to participate for this program than patients that live in an area<20 min away from training center (OR=0.196; P<0.05). Odds of attending in training program for patients with poor health status was less than patients with excellent health status (OR=0.282; P<0.05). Participation in training program were low in patients with more than 5-year diabetes duration compared to less than 1 year (OR=0.176; P<0.05).
Conclusion: The implementation of the classes at the right time and online, Reduce the distance between people and the place of the class, providing facilities and providing infrastructure may be appropriate to involve women and the elderly.
Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Socioeconomic Factors.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Factors influencing mobile health utilisation among patients with diabetes in Sichuan, China: a cross-sectional study based on Andersen's behavioural model.BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 17;15(4):e091921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091921. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40246567 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative study exploring the barriers to attending structured education programmes among adults with type 2 diabetes.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 30;22(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07980-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35501809 Free PMC article.
-
Disparities in attendance at diabetes self-management education programs after diagnosis in Ontario, Canada: a cohort study.BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 30;13:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-85. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23360373 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of self-management program for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on PRECEDE-PROCEDE model.Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Jan-Feb;13(1):440-443. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 22. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019. PMID: 30641740 Review.
-
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32568666 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The urban-rural disparities and factors associated with the utilization of public health services among diabetes patients in China.BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):2290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17198-y. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37985982 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing mobile health utilisation among patients with diabetes in Sichuan, China: a cross-sectional study based on Andersen's behavioural model.BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 17;15(4):e091921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091921. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40246567 Free PMC article.
-
Why healthcare providers are not vaccinated? A qualitative study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran.BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 13;24(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02166-7. BMC Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 37828425 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pamungkas RA, Chamroonsawasdi K. Self-management based coaching program to improve diabetes mellitus self-management practice and metabolic markers among uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus in Indonesia: A quasi-experimental study. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(1):53–61. - PubMed
-
- Federation ID. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 7. IDF Brussels; 2015.
-
- Cho N, Shaw J, Karuranga S, Huang Yd, da Rocha Fernandes J, Ohlrogge A, Malanda B. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;138:271–281. - PubMed
-
- Davari M, Moghaddam HR, Soola AH. Identifying the Predictors of Self-Management Behaviors in Patients with Diabetes Based on Ecological Approach: A Systematic Review. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2021;17(6):71–83. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical